Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of intrathecal analgesia with fentanyl or sufentanil after total hip replacement.
We designed this study to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil, the end points being onset, quality, and duration of action. A total of 42 geriatric patients, scheduled for elective total hip replacement under continuous spinal anesthesia, were randomized in two double-blinded groups as soon as they experienced a pain score higher than 3 of 10 on the visual analog scale in the recovery room. Either 7.5 microg sufentanil or 40 microg fentanyl in 2 mL normal saline were intrathecally administered. Pain scores, rescue analgesia (ketorolac and morphine), and adverse effects (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and itching) were recorded for 24 h after surgery. In both groups, comparing sufentanil to fentanyl, the time to a pain score <3 (9 +/- 9 vs 11 +/- 8 min), the time to the lowest pain score (18 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 15 min), and the time to the first systemic analgesic intervention for a pain score >3 (241 +/- 102 vs 214 +/- 120 min) were comparable as were the analgesic requirements during the first 24 h. We conclude that, after total hip replacement, both lipid soluble opioids produce excellent analgesia with comparable onset, duration of action, and low incidence of minor adverse effects. ⋯ We compared the postoperative analgesic properties of 40 microg intrathecal fentanyl and 7.5 microg sufentanil after total hip replacement. Both opioids provided satisfactory analgesia, with comparable onset (11 +/- 8 vs 9 +/- 9 min) and duration of action (214 +/- 120 vs 241 +/- 102 min), as well as low incidence of minor side effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2000
Meta AnalysisPrevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review.
The best intervention to prevent pain on injection with propofol is unknown. We conducted a systematic literature search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, bibliographies, hand searching, any language, up to September 1999) for full reports of randomized comparisons of analgesic interventions with placebo to prevent that pain. We analyzed data from 6264 patients (mostly adults) of 56 reports. On average, 70% of the patients reported pain on injection. Fifteen drugs, 12 physical measurements, and combinations were tested. With IV lidocaine 40 mg, given with a tourniquet 30 to 120 s before the injection of propofol, the number of patients needed to be treated (NNT) to prevent pain in one who would have had pain had they received placebo was 1.6. The closest to this came meperidine 40 mg with tourniquet (NNT 1.9) and metoclopramide 10 mg with tourniquet (NNT 2.2). With lidocaine mixed with propofol, the best NNT was 2.4; with IV alfentanil or fentanyl, it was 3 to 4. IV lidocaine before the injection of propofol was less analgesic. Temperature had no significant effect. There was a lack of data for all other interventions to allow meaningful conclusions. The diameter of venous catheters and speed of injection had no impact on pain. ⋯ IV lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) should be given with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm, 30 to 120 s before the injection of propofol; lidocaine will prevent pain in approximately 60% of the patients treated in this manner.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study.
The purpose of this study was to describe the dose-response relationship of epidural morphine for postcesarean analgesia for quality of analgesia and relation to the side effects of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. Sixty term parturients undergoing nonurgent cesarean delivery were enrolled and randomized to receive a single dose of epidural morphine after delivery (0,1.25, 2.5, 3.75, or 5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use and the incidence and severity of side effects were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, Student's t-tests, and chi(2) analysis. Nonlinear regression was used to describe a dose-response curve. PCA use differed significantly among groups (P < 0.001); PCA use was significantly greater in Group 0 mg than Groups 2.5, 3.75, and 5 mg (P < 0.05). PCA use was also significantly greater in Group 1.25 mg than Groups 3.75 and 5 mg (P < 0.05). Pruritus scores were significantly higher in all groups given epidural morphine than the control group (0 mg) (P < 0.05), but did not differ among the treatment groups (1.25-5 mg), although pruritus scores were significantly higher in treatment groups than in the control (P < 0. 05). No relation was found between epidural morphine dose and incidence or severity of nausea and vomiting. We concluded that, for optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary. ⋯ Quality of analgesia increases as the dose of epidural morphine increases to at least 3.75 mg; increasing the dose further to 5 mg did not improve analgesia. Side effects were not dose related. For optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary.
-
The esophageal-tracheal Combitube((R)) (ETC; Kendall-Sheridan Catheter Corp., Argyle, NY) is a new device designed for difficult airways and emergency intubation. The manufacturer recommends that the ETC model 37F SA be used in patients with a height of between 122 and 152 cm. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ventilation is effective and reliable in patients taller than 152 cm by using the ETC 37F SA in the esophageal position. Also, we evaluated whether the airway protection is adequate and whether direct intubation of the trachea with the ETC inserted in the esophagus is possible. We studied 25 anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients, 150 to 180 cm in height. Methylene blue was given orally to all patients before anesthesia induction. Under direct vision, a ETC 37F SA was inserted in the esophagus of all patients. The pharyngeal balloon inflation volume was titrated to air leak and cuff pressures were measured. During surgery, a laryngoscope was inserted into the pharynx with the pharyngeal balloon deflated and the laryngoscopic view was evaluated by using the Cormack-Lehane scale. The presence of methylene blue in the hypopharynx was investigated by direct laryngoscopic vision. Ventilation was effective and reliable in all 25 patients who were 150 to 180 cm in height (average 169 +/- 7 cm). In addition, a direct relationship between the pharyngeal balloon volume and patient height was established (P < 0.05), by using linear regression models. The laryngoscopic view of the glottis was adequate to allow direct tracheal intubation. No trace of methylene blue was detected in the hypopharynx. The ETC Model 37F SA may be used in patients from 122 to 185 cm in height. The trachea could be directly intubated with the ETC in the esophageal position in patients with normal airways. The airway protection appears to be adequate. ⋯ The esophageal-tracheal Combitube((R)) Model 37F SA (Kendall-Sheridan Catheter Corp., Argyle, NY) may be used in patients from 122 to 185 cm in height. The trachea could be directly intubated with the Combitube((R)) in esophageal position in patients with normal airways. The airway protection appears to be adequate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2000
The accuracy and precision of body temperature monitoring methods during regional and general anesthesia.
We tested the hypotheses that accuracy and precision of available temperature monitoring methods are different between spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA), and that patients receiving SA are at equal risk for hypothermia as those receiving GA. Patients scheduled for radical retropubic prostatectomy were enrolled. Either GA (n = 16) or SA (n = 16) was given according to patient and clinician preference. Temperatures were monitored with thermocouple probes at the tympanic membrane, axilla, rectum, and forehead skin surface. Tympanic temperatures were also measured with an infrared device, and forehead skin temperatures were monitored with two brands of liquid crystal thermometer strips. Accuracy and precision of these monitoring methods were determined by using tympanic membrane temperature, measured by thermocouple, as the reference core temperature (T(c)). At the end of surgery, T(c) was similar between SA (35.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C) and GA (35.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C) (P = 0.44). Accuracy and precision of each temperature monitoring method were similar between SA and GA. Rectal temperature monitoring offered the greatest combination of accuracy and precision. All other methods underestimated T(c). These findings suggest that patients receiving SA or GA are at equal and significant risk for hypothermia, and should have their temperatures carefully monitored, recognizing that most monitoring methods underestimate T(c). ⋯ Body temperature should be monitored during spinal anesthesia because patients are at significant risk for hypothermia. Rectal temperature is a valid method of measuring core temperature, whereas other methods tend to underestimate true core temperature.