Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison between meperidine, clonidine and urapidil in the treatment of postanesthetic shivering.
Postanesthetic shivering can be treated with many types of drugs. We compared the effects of meperidine, clonidine, and urapidil on postanesthetic shivering. Sixty patients shivering during recovery from general anesthesia were treated in a randomized, double-blinded fashion with 25 mg meperidine IV, 0.15 mg clonidine IV, or 25 mg urapidil IV in three separate groups of 20 patients each. If shivering did not stop within 5 min, the treatment was repeated once; clonidine was replaced with saline for the second dose. Rectal temperature, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, SaO(2) and vigilance were monitored. Clonidine stopped shivering in all 20 patients. A single dose of meperidine stopped the shivering in 18 of 20 patients, with the other 2 patients needing a second dose. Urapidil was less effective: the first dose stopped the shivering in only six patients; the second dose was effective in another six; the drug was ineffective in 8 of 20 patients. Meperidine and clonidine were both nearly 100% effective in treating postanesthetic shivering without negative side effects. By comparison, urapidil was only effective in 60% of patients treated (P <0.01). ⋯ Patients shivering during recovery from general anesthesia were treated in a randomized double-blinded fashion with meperidine, clonidine, or urapidil. Meperidine and clonidine were both very effective, whereas urapidil was only effective in 60% of patients treated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of dexamethasone on postoperative pain and emesis after intrathecal neostigmine.
We evaluated the effect of a single dose of dexamethasone on the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after intrathecal injection of tetracaine plus neostigmine. Sixty ASA physical status I patients scheduled for inguinal herniorrhaphy were studied with a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled protocol. The dexamethasone group (Group D) received 10 mg of dexamethasone IV before performance of spinal anesthesia, whereas the placebo group (Group P) received saline. Spinal anesthesia was performed with intrathecal injection of 15 mg tetracaine plus neostigmine 100 microg in both groups. Pain, PONV, and other side effects were evaluated 24 h after surgery. The duration and severity of analgesia and the incidence of PONV were not significantly different between the two groups. Our results demonstrate that a single dose of dexamethasone (10 mg) did not potentiate the analgesic effect or reduce the incidence of PONV after intrathecal injection of tetracaine and neostigmine. ⋯ The results of our evaluation of the effect of IV dexamethasone versus saline control on analgesia and nausea and vomiting after intrathecal neostigmine and tetracaine suggest that IV dexamethasone did not enhance the analgesic effect of neostigmine or reduce the incidence of emesis after intrathecal administration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Comparative StudyCardiac resuscitation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized dogs.
There is no information comparing the ability to reverse the cardiotoxic effects associated with incremental overdosage of bupivacaine (BUP) to levobupivacaine (LBUP), ropivacaine (ROP), or lidocaine (LIDO). Open-chest dogs were randomized to receive incremental escalating infusions of BUP, LBUP, ROP, and LIDO to the point of cardiovascular collapse (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < or = 45 mm Hg). Hypotension and arrhythmias were treated with epinephrine, open-chest massage, and advanced cardiac life support protocols, respectively. Outcomes were defined as the following: successful (stable rhythm and MAP > or = 55 mm Hg for 20 min), successful with continued therapy (stable rhythm and MAP <55 mm Hg after 20 min), or death. Continued therapy was required in 86% of LIDO dogs compared with only 10%-30% of the other dogs (P < 0.002). Mortality from BUP, LBUP, ROP, and LIDO was 50%, 30%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Myocardial depression was primarily responsible for the profound hypotension, as the occurrence of lethal arrhythmias preceding resuscitation was not different among local anesthetics. Epinephrine-induced ventricular fibrillation occurred more frequently in BUP-intoxicated dogs than in dogs given LIDO or ROP (P < 0.05). The unbound plasma concentrations at collapse were larger for ROP, 19.8 microg/mL (10-39 microg/mL), compared with BUP, 5.7 microg/mL (3-11 microg/mL); whereas the concentrations of LBUP, 9.4 microg/mL (5-18 microg/mL) and BUP were not significantly different from each other. ⋯ There were consistent differences among the local anesthetics, the sum of which suggests that larger doses and blood concentrations of ropivacaine (ROP) and lidocaine will be tolerated as compared with bupivacaine (BUP) and levobupivacaine (LBUP). Lidocaine intoxication results in myocardial depression from which resuscitation is consistently successful but will require continuing drug support. After BUP, LBUP, or ROP, resuscitation is not always successful, and the administration of epinephrine may lead to severe arrhythmias. The unbound plasma concentrations at collapse were larger for ROP compared with BUP, whereas the concentrations of LBUP and BUP were not significantly different from each other. Furthermore, larger plasma concentrations of ROP than BUP are present after resuscitation, suggesting a wider margin of safety when large volumes and large concentrations are used to establish upper or lower extremity nerve blocks for surgical anesthesia and during long-term infusions for pain management.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Clinical TrialJejunal mucosal perfusion is well maintained during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in humans.
In the present study, the effects of mild hypothermic (34 degrees C) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on jejunal mucosal perfusion (JMP), gastric tonometry, splanchnic lactate, and oxygen extraction were studied in low-risk cardiac surgical patients (n = 10), anesthetized and managed according to clinical routine. JMP was assessed by endoluminal laser Doppler flowmetry. Patients were studied during seven 10-min measurement periods before, during, and 1 h after the end of CPB. Splanchnic oxygen extraction increased during hypothermia and particularly during rewarming and warm CPB. JMP increased during hypothermia (26%), rewarming (31%), and warm CPB (38%) and was higher 1 h after CPB (42%), compared with pre-CPB control. The gastric-arterial PCO(2) difference was slightly increased (range 0.04-2.26 kPa) during rewarming and warm CPB as well as 1 h after CPB, indicating a mismatch between gastric mucosal oxygen delivery and demand. None of the patients produced lactate during CPB. We conclude that jejunal mucosal perfusion appears well preserved during CPB and moderate (34 degrees C) hypothermia; this finding is in contrast to previous studies showing gastric mucosal hypoperfusion during CPB. ⋯ Jejunal mucosal perfusion increases during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Intestinal laser Doppler flowmetry, gastric tonometry, and measurements of splanchnic lactate extraction could not reveal a local or global splanchnic ischemia during or after CPB. A mismatch between splanchnic oxygen delivery and demand was seen, particularly during rewarming and warm CPB.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2001
Clinical TrialIntramuscular versus surface electromyography of the diaphragm for determining neuromuscular blockade.
We determined the neuromuscular blockade of 0.2 mg. kg(-1) mivacurium at the diaphragm by using two new methods of electromyographic (EMG) monitoring and compared it with acceleromyography of the orbicularis oculi (OO) and the corrugator supercilii (CS) muscle. After the induction of anesthesia in 15 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, evoked EMG responses at the diaphragm were obtained by using skin electrodes at the back of the patient, placed lateral to T12/L1 or L1/L2, and a laparoscopically applied wire electrode inserted into the dorsolateral portion of the diaphragm. Acceleromyography at the right OO and the left CS was performed. ⋯ We showed a shorter onset and clinical duration at the diaphragm in comparison with CS and OO. Two methods of EMG of the diaphragm correlated well and showed good comparability. The novel method of surface diaphragmatic EMG at the patient's back may be useful during routine clinical anesthesia.