Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPreoperative small-dose ketamine prevented tourniquet-induced arterial pressure increase in orthopedic patients under general anesthesia.
The mechanism of tourniquet-induced arterial pressure increase is not known. We investigated the effect of preoperative ketamine on tourniquet-induced arterial pressure and heart rate changes in 85 patients undergoing knee surgery with a tourniquet under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups; Large Ketamine (n = 28; ketamine 1.0 mg/kg), Small Ketamine (n = 28; ketamine 0.25 mg/kg), and Control (n = 29; normal saline) groups. Anesthesia was maintained with 1.5%-2.5% sevoflurane and 66% N(2)O in oxygen with endotracheal intubation. Ketamine or normal saline was given in a double-blinded fashion before skin incision and tourniquet inflation. Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded every 10 min until 60 min after the start of tourniquet inflation and again after deflation. Arterial pressure and heart rate were compared among the three groups by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. In the Large and Small Ketamine groups, arterial pressure was not significantly changed, but in the Control group arterial pressure was significantly increased 40, 50, and 60 min after the start of tourniquet inflation (P < 0.05). Development of more than a 30% increase in systolic arterial pressure during tourniquet inflation was more frequent in the Control group than the other groups. The results show that preoperative IV ketamine, 0.25 mg/kg or more, significantly prevented tourniquet-induced systemic arterial pressure increase in patients under general anesthesia. ⋯ Preoperative small-dose ketamine, IV, significantly prevented a systemic arterial pressure increase during prolonged tourniquet inflation in patients under general anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways.
We performed the current study to compare tracheal intubation (TI) using awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) and TI using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients with difficult airway. Our hypothesis was that patients with difficult airways could be safely intubated after induction of anesthesia using the ILMA. After ethics approval and informed consent, 38 patients who were identified to have difficult airways were randomly assigned to AFOI or TI using the ILMA. Patients in the AFOI group had the usual sedation and airway topicalization. Patients in the ILMA group were induced with propofol for ILMA insertion and succinylcholine for TI. The first TI attempt was done blindly via the ILMA and all subsequent attempts were performed with fiberoptic guidance. All patients in the ILMA group were successfully ventilated. Successful TI was achieved in all patients in both groups. However, in 10% of the patients in the ILMA group, TI was achieved by a second anesthesiologist who was more experienced with the use of the ILMA. In a postoperative questionnaire, patients in the ILMA group were more satisfied with their method of TI (P < 0.01). The ILMA is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to AFOI when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway. ⋯ The intubating laryngeal mask airway is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAuditory information processing during adequate propofol anesthesia monitored by electroencephalogram bispectral index.
Memory for intraoperative events may arise from inadequate anesthesia when the hypnotic state is not continuously monitored. Electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) enables monitoring of the hypnotic state and titration of anesthesia to an adequate level (BIS 40 to 60). At this level, preserved memory function has been observed in trauma patients. We investigated memory formation in elective surgical outpatients during target-controlled propofol anesthesia supplemented with alfentanil. While BIS remained between 40 and 60, patients listened to a tape with either familiar instances (exemplars) from two categories (Experimental [E] group, n = 41) or bird sounds (Control [C] group, n = 41). After recovery, memory was tested directly and indirectly. BIS during audio presentation was on average (+/- SD) 44 +/- 5 and 46 +/- 5 for Groups E and C, respectively. No patient consciously recalled the intraoperative period, nor were presented words recognized reliably (Group E, 0.9 +/- 0.8 hits; Group C, 0.8 +/- 0.8 hits) (P = 0.7). When asked to generate category exemplars, Group E named 2.10 +/- 1.0 hits versus 1.98 +/- 1.0 in Group C (P = 0.9). We found no explicit or implicit memory effect of familiar words presented during adequate propofol anesthesia at BIS levels between 40 and 60 in elective surgical patients. ⋯ This study suggests that stable levels of adequate hypnosis may prevent information processing and memory formation during general anesthesia and supports the feasibility of electroencephalogram bispectral index as a monitor of adequate anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPreoxygenation with tidal volume and deep breathing techniques: the impact of duration of breathing and fresh gas flow.
Various techniques of "preoxygenation" before anesthetic induction have been advocated, including tidal volume breathing (TVB) for 3-5 min, four deep breaths (DB) in 0.5 min, and eight DB in 1 min. However, no study has compared the effectiveness of these techniques, assessed extending deep breathing beyond 1 min, or investigated the influence of fresh gas flow (FGF) in the same subjects using a circle absorber system. In 24 healthy adult volunteers breathing oxygen from a circle absorber system by tight-fitting mask, we compared TVB/5 min and deep breathing at a rate of 4 DB/0.5 min for 2 min at 5, 7, and 10 L/min FGF. Inspired and end-tidal respiratory gases were measured at 0.5-min intervals. During TVB, end-tidal oxygen (ETO2) increased rapidly and plateaued by 2.5 min at 86%, 88%, and 88% with 5, 7 and 10 L/min FGF, respectively. ETO2 values of > or =90% were attained between 3 and 4 min. Four DB/0.5 min increased ETO2 to 75%, 77%, and 80% at 5, 7, and 10 L/min FGF. Eight DB/min resulted in ETO2 values of 82% and 87% at 7 and 10 L/min, respectively. Extending deep breathing to 1.5 and 2 min with 10 L/min FGF increased ETO2 by > or =90%, although a decrease in ETCo(2) was noted. We concluded that TVB/3-5 min was effective in achieving maximal "preoxygenation" whereas 4 DB/0.5 min resulted in submaximal "preoxygenation," and thus should be used only when time is limited. Increasing FGF from 5 to 10 L/min does not enhance "preoxygenation" with either TVB or 4 DB/0.5 min. Deep breathing yields maximal "preoxygenation" when extended to 1.5 or 2 min, and only when high (10 L/min) FGF is used. ⋯ Using a circle absorber system, normal breathing of oxygen for 3-5 min achieves optimal oxygenation of the lungs; whereas 4 deep breaths in 30 s does not. However, extending deep breathing to 1.5-2 min and using a high flow of oxygen improves oxygenation of the lungs to the same degree as normal breathing for 3-5 min. This may have important implications for patient safety.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
The adequacy of basic intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography performed by experienced anesthesiologists.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may improve intraoperative decision-making and patient outcome if it is performed and interpreted correctly. After revising our TEE examination to fulfill the published guidelines for basic TEE practitioners, we prospectively evaluated the ability of our cardiac anesthesiologists (all very experienced with TEE) to record and interpret this revised examination. Educational aids and regular TEE performance feedback were provided to the anesthesiologists. Their interpretations were compared with the independently determined results of experts. Compared with their own historical controls (42% recording rate), all anesthesiologists showed significant improvement in their ability to record a basic intraoperative TEE examination resulting in 81% (P < 0.0001) of all required images being recorded: 88% before cardiopulmonary bypass, 77% immediately after bypass, and 64% after chest closure. Seventy-nine percent of the images recorded at baseline were correctly interpreted, 6% were incorrectly interpreted, and 15% were not evaluated. Our attempt to assess compliance with published guidelines for basic intraoperative TEE resulted in a marked improvement in our intraoperative TEE practice. Most, but not all, standard cross-sections are recorded or interpreted correctly, even by highly experienced and motivated practitioners. ⋯ Experienced cardiac anesthesiologists can obtain and correctly interpret most basic intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms.