Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDuration of action of vecuronium after an intubating dose of rapacuronium, vecuronium, or succinylcholine.
Rapacuronium (RAP) is a new, rapid-onset, short-duration, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocker. If RAP is used to facilitate endotracheal intubation, what will the duration of a subsequent maintenance dose of vecuronium (VEC) be? We investigated the duration of action of a maintenance dose of VEC after intubation with RAP, VEC, or succinylcholine (SUC). Adult surgical patients under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive a tracheal intubating dose of RAP 1.5 mg/kg, VEC 0.1 mg/kg, or SUC 1 mg/kg. The anesthetic was induced with propofol and maintained with propofol, nitrous oxide, and oxygen. Neuromuscular function was monitored with electromyography. Recovery of the intubating dose of neuromuscular blocker was allowed to occur spontaneously until the first twitch of the train-of-four (T1) reached 50% of baseline, and then VEC 0.025 mg/kg (0.5 x 95% effective dose [ED(95)]) was administered. The onset, duration, and recovery to T1 = 25% and 50% were recorded. The durations of action (recovery of T1 25%) after intubating doses of RAP, VEC, and SUC were 13.7 +/- 5.3, 43.2 +/- 13.2, and 9.2 +/- 3.7 min (mean +/- SD), respectively (P < 0.0001). The times to maximum depression of T1 after a maintenance dose of VEC (0.5 x ED(95)) were 5.4 +/- 2.9, 5.1 +/- 2.5, and 5.3 +/- 2.8 min (mean +/- SD) for the RAP, VEC, and SUC groups, respectively. Recoveries to T1 25% after VEC for the RAP, VEC, and SUC groups were 18.9 +/- 11.5, 21.5 +/- 8.03, and 12.8 +/- 8.4 min, and at T1 50% they were 21.5 +/- 9.1, 30.8 +/- 9.5, and 15.5 +/- 9.7 min (mean +/- SD), respectively (P < 0.001, RAP and VEC versus SUC). The duration of action of a maintenance dose of VEC was similar after an intubating dose of RAP or VEC but was shortened when preceded by an intubating dose of SUC. ⋯ The duration of action of a maintenance dose of vecuronium was longer after an endotracheal intubating dose of rapacuronium compared with succinylcholine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAuditory information processing during adequate propofol anesthesia monitored by electroencephalogram bispectral index.
Memory for intraoperative events may arise from inadequate anesthesia when the hypnotic state is not continuously monitored. Electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) enables monitoring of the hypnotic state and titration of anesthesia to an adequate level (BIS 40 to 60). At this level, preserved memory function has been observed in trauma patients. We investigated memory formation in elective surgical outpatients during target-controlled propofol anesthesia supplemented with alfentanil. While BIS remained between 40 and 60, patients listened to a tape with either familiar instances (exemplars) from two categories (Experimental [E] group, n = 41) or bird sounds (Control [C] group, n = 41). After recovery, memory was tested directly and indirectly. BIS during audio presentation was on average (+/- SD) 44 +/- 5 and 46 +/- 5 for Groups E and C, respectively. No patient consciously recalled the intraoperative period, nor were presented words recognized reliably (Group E, 0.9 +/- 0.8 hits; Group C, 0.8 +/- 0.8 hits) (P = 0.7). When asked to generate category exemplars, Group E named 2.10 +/- 1.0 hits versus 1.98 +/- 1.0 in Group C (P = 0.9). We found no explicit or implicit memory effect of familiar words presented during adequate propofol anesthesia at BIS levels between 40 and 60 in elective surgical patients. ⋯ This study suggests that stable levels of adequate hypnosis may prevent information processing and memory formation during general anesthesia and supports the feasibility of electroencephalogram bispectral index as a monitor of adequate anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
The adequacy of basic intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography performed by experienced anesthesiologists.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may improve intraoperative decision-making and patient outcome if it is performed and interpreted correctly. After revising our TEE examination to fulfill the published guidelines for basic TEE practitioners, we prospectively evaluated the ability of our cardiac anesthesiologists (all very experienced with TEE) to record and interpret this revised examination. Educational aids and regular TEE performance feedback were provided to the anesthesiologists. Their interpretations were compared with the independently determined results of experts. Compared with their own historical controls (42% recording rate), all anesthesiologists showed significant improvement in their ability to record a basic intraoperative TEE examination resulting in 81% (P < 0.0001) of all required images being recorded: 88% before cardiopulmonary bypass, 77% immediately after bypass, and 64% after chest closure. Seventy-nine percent of the images recorded at baseline were correctly interpreted, 6% were incorrectly interpreted, and 15% were not evaluated. Our attempt to assess compliance with published guidelines for basic intraoperative TEE resulted in a marked improvement in our intraoperative TEE practice. Most, but not all, standard cross-sections are recorded or interpreted correctly, even by highly experienced and motivated practitioners. ⋯ Experienced cardiac anesthesiologists can obtain and correctly interpret most basic intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Case ReportsArytenoid dislocation while using a McCoy laryngoscope.
Arytenoid dislocation (AD) involves either a complete disruption of the cricoarytenoid joint or a malpositioning of the arytenoid cartilages (AC) with reference to other laryngeal cartilages. In this report, we present a case of AD while using a McCoy laryngoscope. Although McCoy laryngoscope is recognized as a useful option for the cases of difficult endotracheal intubation, we are concerned that AD is likely with this device.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Ultrasonographic findings of the axillary part of the brachial plexus.
In this prospective study we sought to determine anatomic variations of the main brachial plexus nerves in the axilla and upper arm via high-resolution ultrasonography (US) examination. Positions of nerves were studied via US in three sectional levels of the upper arm in 69 healthy volunteers (31 men and 38 women, median age 28 yr). Analysis was done by subdividing the US picture into eight pie-chart sectors and matching sectors for the position of the ulnar, radial, and median nerves. Shortly after the nerves pass the pectoralis minor muscle, they begin to diverge. At the middle level 9%-13%, and at the distal level, 30%-81% of the nerves are not seen together with the artery in the US picture. At the usual level of axillary block approach, we found the ulnar nerve in the posterior medial position in 59% of the volunteers. The other two nerves had two peaks in distribution: the radial nerve in posterior lateral (38%) and anterior lateral (20%) position, and the median nerve in anterior medial (30%) and posterior medial (26%) position. Applying light pressure distally can displace nerves to the side, especially when they are positioned anterior to the axillary artery. We conclude that an axillary block should be attempted as proximal as possible to the axilla. ⋯ This prospective ultrasonography study demonstrates significant anatomic variations of the main brachial plexus nerves in the axilla and upper arm, which may increase the difficulty in identifying neural structures. Applying light pressure on the plexus can move nerves to the side, especially when they are positioned anterior to the axillary artery.