Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe efficacy of preemptive Milrinone or Amrinone therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Acute deterioration in ventricular function and oxygen transport is common after cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that milrinone or amrinone may reduce their occurrence and catecholamine requirements and increase cellular enzyme levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass. In 45 patients, we randomly administered milrinone 50 microg/kg plus 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion for 10 h, amrinone 1.5 mg/kg plus 10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion for 10 h, or placebo at release of aortic cross-clamp. Hemodynamic variables, dopamine requirement, and laboratory values were recorded. At the postoperative nadir, stroke volume index was higher in the Milrinone and Amrinone groups (mean +/- SD, 27.8 +/- 4.0 and 26.1 +/- 3.2 vs. 20.4 +/- 5.1 mL x min (-1) x m(-2) per beat, P < 0.0001), and oxygen transport index was higher (354.7 +/- 57.8 and 353.7 +/- 91.2 vs 283.0 +/- 83.9 mL. min(-1) x m(-2), P = 0.009). The postoperative dopamine requirement was less (6.6 +/- 2.7 and 6.8 +/- 2.6 vs 10.4 +/- 2.0 mg/kg, P < 0.008), and postoperative serum lactate, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine kinase, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels were less (P < 0.01). The mean postoperative heart rate was faster in the Milrinone group than in the Amrinone and Placebo groups (96.8 +/- 10.3 vs. 86.9 +/- 9.5 and 87.8 +/- 10.8 bpm, P < 0.01). Milrinone and amrinone administered preemptively reduce postoperative deterioration in cardiac function and oxygen transport, dopamine requirement, and increases in serum lactate, glucose, and enzyme levels, although milrinone may increase heart rate. ⋯ Preemptive milrinone or amrinone administration before separation from cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgical patients not only ameliorates postoperative deterioration in cardiac function and oxygen transport, but also reduces dopamine requirement and increases serum lactate, glucose, and cellular enzyme levels, although milrinone may increase heart rate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRemifentanil provides hemodynamic stability and faster awakening time in transsphenoidal surgery.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the effects of remifentanil in ASA I-II patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. After the induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to the Isoflurane (n = 22, 60% nitrous oxide, isoflurane up to 2% end-tidal) or Remifentanil group (n = 21, 60% nitrous oxide, 0.5% end-tidal isoflurane, remifentanil up to 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). If mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased >80 mm Hg during maximal dosage of isoflurane or remifentanil, labetalol was administered. At the end of anesthesia, extubation and awakening times, respiratory rate, SpO(2), MAP, heart rate, and adverse effects were recorded. Hemodynamics and bleeding (minimal, mild, moderate, severe) were not different between groups. Bleeding grade increased with MAP >80 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Labetalol was administered to 20 patients in the Isoflurane group, and 10 patients in the Remifentanil group (P < 0.01). The dose of labetalol was larger in the Isoflurane group (1.0 +/- 0.6 versus 0.5 +/- 0.7 mg/kg, P < 0.05). Time to extubation did not differ, whereas time to follow commands was shorter in Remifentanil patients (16 +/- 8 versus 10 +/- 2 min, P < 0.01). No adverse effects occurred in the early postoperative period. ⋯ In patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery, balanced anesthesia with remifentanil (0.22 +/- 0.17 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) provides faster awakening time, as compared with large-dose volatile-based anesthesia, without the risk of postoperative opioid respiratory depression.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThermoregulatory response to intraoperative head-down tilt.
Thermoregulation interacts with cardiovascular regulation within the central nervous system. We therefore evaluated the effects of head-down tilt on intraoperative thermal and cardiovascular regulation. Thirty-two patients undergoing lower-abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to the 1) supine, 2) 15 degrees -20 degrees head-down tilt, 3) leg-up, or 4) combination of leg-up and head-down tilt position. Core temperature and forearm minus fingertip skin-temperature gradients (an index of peripheral vasoconstriction) were monitored for 3 h after the induction of combined general and lumbar epidural anesthesia. We also determined cardiac output and central-venous and esophageal pressures. Neither right atrial transmural pressure nor cardiac index was altered in the Head-Down Tilt group, but both increased significantly in the Leg-Up groups. The vasoconstriction threshold was reduced in both leg-up positions but was not significantly decreased by head-down tilt. Final core temperatures were 35.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C (mean +/- SEM) in the Supine group, 35.0 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the Head-Down Tilt group, 34.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C in the Leg-Up group (P < 0.05 compared with supine), and 34.3 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C when leg-up and head-down tilt were combined (P < 0.05 compared with supine). These results confirm that elevating the legs increases right atrial transmural pressure, reduces the vasoconstriction threshold, and aggravates intraoperative hypothermia. Surprisingly, maintaining a head-down tilt did not increase right atrial pressure. ⋯ Intraoperative hypothermia is exaggerated when patients are maintained in the leg-up position because the vasoconstriction threshold is reduced. However, head-down tilt (Trendelenburg position) does not reduce the vasoconstriction threshold or aggravate hypothermia. The head-down tilt position thus does not require special perioperative thermal precautions or management unless the leg-up position is used simultaneously.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe assessment of postural stability after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane with propofol.
We designed this study to evaluate postural stability in outpatients after either desflurane or propofol anesthesia. After IRB approval, 120 consenting women undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures were randomly assigned to receive either desflurane or propofol-based general anesthesia. After surgery, patients' postural stability was measured as body sway velocity by using a computerized force platform in the following conditions: 1) standing on a firm surface with eyes open versus closed and 2) standing on a foam surface with eyes open versus closed. These measurements were made before anesthesia, immediately after the patient achieved a Post-Anesthesia Discharge Score of 9, and at actual discharge home. At the time patients first achieved a Post-Anesthesia Discharge Score of 9, the body sway in the Propofol group was significantly more than in the Desflurane group when patients were asked to stand on a foam surface with eyes closed (testing the ability of using vestibular information for balance control). We concluded that the desflurane-based anesthetic was associated with better postural control than the propofol-based anesthetic in the early recovery period after outpatient gynecological laparoscopic procedures. ⋯ The residual effects of the short-acting general anesthetics desflurane and propofol on patient's balance function during recovery after surgery were assessed with a computerized force platform. The results showed that desflurane seemed to be associated with better postural control than propofol in the early recovery period.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe influence of nicardipine-, nitroglycerin-, and prostaglandin E(1)-induced hypotension on cerebral pressure autoregulation in adult patients during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia.
We investigated the influence of drug-induced hypotension at a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60-70 mm Hg on cerebral pressure autoregulation in 45 adult patients during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia. Time-averaged mean blood flow velocity in the right middle cerebral artery (Vmca) was continuously measured at a PaCO(2) of 39-40 mm Hg by using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Hypotension was induced and maintained with a continuous infusion of nicardipine, nitroglycerin, or prostaglandin E(1). Cerebral autoregulation was tested by a slow continuous infusion of phenylephrine to induce an increase in MAP of 20-30 mm Hg. From the simultaneously recorded data of Vmca and MAP, cerebral vascular resistance (CVR) was calculated as MAP/Vmca. Furthermore, the index of autoregulation (IOR) was calculated as DeltaCVR/DeltaMAP, where DeltaCVR = change in CVR and DeltaMAP = change in MAP. The test was performed twice for each condition on each patient: baseline and hypotension. The IOR during baseline was similar among the groups. During nitroglycerin- and prostaglandin E(1)-induced hypotension, IOR was not different from baseline. In contrast, during nicardipine-induced hypotension, IOR significantly decreased compared with baseline (0.37 +/- 0.08 versus 0.83 +/- 0.07, P < 0.01). In conclusion, nicardipine, but not nitroglycerin or prostaglandin E(1), significantly attenuates cerebral pressure autoregulation during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia. ⋯ Vasodilators may influence cerebral autoregulation by changing cerebral vascular tone. Nicardipine, but not nitroglycerin or prostaglandin E(1), attenuated cerebral pressure autoregulation in normal adult patients during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia.