Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia for endotracheal intubation in children.
Supplementing a sevoflurane induction of anesthesia in children with IV lidocaine 2 mg/kg can suppress cough after tracheal intubation and thus improve intubating conditions. In addition, lidocaine minimizes blood pressure fluctuations after tracheal intubation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Meta AnalysisEpidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for labor: a meta-analysis.
Numerous studies have compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Early studies suggested that obstetrical and some neonatal outcomes were improved when ropivacaine was used. We systematically reviewed and combined the results of the randomized controlled trials that compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine to determine whether or not there was a difference in these outcomes. We searched electronic databases and journals for randomized controlled trials composed of laboring parturients. The primary outcome was the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery. We examined other obstetrical, neonatal, and analgesic outcomes. Where possible, these were combined by using metaanalytic techniques and random effects modeling. We found 23 randomized controlled trials composed of 1043 patients receiving ropivacaine and 1031 receiving bupivacaine. There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.12) or any of the other outcomes. Although more studies reported a more frequent incidence of motor block with bupivacaine, the results were heterogeneous and therefore not combined. We conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in the incidence of any obstetrical or neonatal outcome. Further studies using clinically appropriate concentrations of drugs are required to determine whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of motor block. ⋯ This metaanalysis of 23 randomized controlled trials shows that both ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide excellent labor analgesia. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in mode of delivery, maternal satisfaction, or neonatal outcomes. Whether or not there is a difference in motor block at clinically relevant doses is unresolved.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
ReviewEducating patients about anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of media-based interventions.
In this systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of media-based patient education about anesthesia. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (n = 1506) were identified after a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry), published articles, and contact with authors. Outcomes assessed were anxiety, knowledge, and patient satisfaction. Anxiety levels before anesthesia were less intense in subjects receiving the video and printed information compared with those receiving no intervention (weighted mean difference of 3; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1-5 Spielberger's State and Trait Anxiety Inventory). Patients in the video group were more likely to answer all knowledge questions correctly compared with patients with no intervention (relative risk of 6.64; 95%CI, 2.05-21.52). The level of knowledge about pain management was higher in the video group compared with patients with no intervention (weighted mean difference of 17%; 95%CI, 9-25). However, the level of patient satisfaction with the intervention (expectation versus actual anesthetic experience) was similar between the groups (relative risk of 1.06; 95%CI, 0.93-1.22). This systematic review supports the use of video and printed information about general process and risks of anesthesia for patient education before surgery. ⋯ The effectiveness of media-based interventions for educating patients about general process and risks of anesthesia were compared in this systematic review. The use of video and/or printed information can decrease patient anxiety and increase patient knowledge. However, patient satisfaction was similar between media-based intervention and nonintervention groups.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTracheal extubation of deeply anesthetized pediatric patients: a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane.
In this study, we examined the emergence characteristics of children tracheally extubated while deeply anesthetized with desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S). Forty-eight children were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. At the end of the operation, all subjects were tracheally extubated while breathing 1.5 times the minimal effective concentration of assigned inhaled anesthetic. Recovery characteristics and complications were noted. Group D patients had higher arousal scores on arrival to the postanesthesia care unit than Group S patients. Later arousal scores were not significantly different. No serious complications occurred in either group. Coughing episodes and the overall incidence of complications after extubation were more frequent in Group D. Readiness for discharge and actual time to discharge were not significantly different between groups. Emergence agitation was common in both groups (33% overall, 46% for Group D, and 21% for Group S). Narcotic administration in the postanesthesia care unit occurred more frequently in Group D (10 of 24 patients) versus Group S (3 of 24 patients). Premedication with oral midazolam resulted in significantly longer emergence times regardless of the potent inhaled anesthetic administered. ⋯ Deep extubation of children can be performed safely with desflurane or sevoflurane. Airway problems occur more frequently with desflurane. Awakening occurs more quickly with desflurane. Midazolam premedication has a greater effect on emergence times than does the choice of inhaled anesthetic. Emergence agitation occurs frequently with either technique.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialNitrous oxide attenuates pressor but augments norepinephrine response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) exerts a sympathomimetic action. We investigated whether N(2)O modifies the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation during general anesthesia. One-hundred healthy patients were assigned randomly to receive one of four concentrations (0%, 25%, 50%, or 75%; n = 25 each) of N(2)O in oxygen throughout the study beginning 3 min before tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was induced with IV thiopental (5-7 mg/kg) whereas patients were ventilated with designated concentrations of N(2)O. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with IV vecuronium (0.12 mg/kg). After intubation, all received 2% sevoflurane in oxygen via a semiclosed anesthesia circuit. Systolic arterial blood pressure, heart rate and rhythm, and plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured. The intubation significantly increased arterial blood pressure and heart rate. The maximum pressure changes were 46 +/- 21 and 65 +/- 24 mm Hg in 75% N(2)O and control groups, respectively (P < 0.05), being attenuated by N(2)O without affecting the tachycardiac response. Norepinephrine concentrations were increased at 1 min after the intubation, the magnitude of which was augmented by N(2)O. N(2)O did not affect the incidence of arrhythmias. It was shown that N(2)O suppressed the pressor response to endotracheal intubation, despite the augmented increase of norepinephrine concentrations. ⋯ We examined whether nitrous oxide modifies the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation because it activates the sympathetic nervous system. Nitrous oxide attenuated the pressor response, whereas it augmented the norepinephrine response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.