Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Clinical TrialARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during the induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.
A new commercial auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitor (A-line AEP monitor) was developed to calculate an index (ARX AEP index; AAI) by automatically using the amplitudes and latencies of the AEP. We investigated 30 patients before spine surgery. AAI; bispectral index (BIS); relative (%) delta, theta, alpha, and beta; spectral edge frequency; median frequency; mean arterial blood pressure; heart rate; and oxygen saturation were obtained simultaneously during stepwise (1.0 micro g/mL) induction of target-controlled propofol concentration until 5.0 micro g/mL, followed by an infusion of 0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) of remifentanil. Every minute, the patients were asked to squeeze the observer's hand. Prediction probability (Pk), receiver operating characteristic, and logistic regression were used to calculate the probability to predict the conditions AWAKE, UNCONSCIOUSNESS (first loss of hand squeeze), and steady-state ANESTHESIA (5.0 micro g/mL of propofol and 0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) of remifentanil). Although a statistically significant difference among the conditions was observed for AAI, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, median frequency, and %alpha, only AAI and BIS were able to distinguish UNCONSCIOUSNESS versus AWAKE and ANESTHESIA versus AWAKE with better than Pk = 0.90. The modern electroencephalographic variables AAI and BIS were superior to the classic electroencephalographic and hemodynamic variables to distinguish the observed anesthetic conditions. ⋯ The modern electroencephalographic ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and the bispectral index were superior to the classic electroencephalographic and hemodynamic variables for predicting anesthetic conditions. Variables derived from the auditory evoked potential did not provide an advantage over variables derived from spontaneous electroencephalogram.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients.
We compared the Size 4 and 5 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in men and the Size 3 and 4, and 4 and 5 PLMA in women in terms of 1) ease of insertion, 2) oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), 3) ease of ventilation at a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, 4) gas exchange, 5) location of gas leak, 6) anatomic position of the airway and drain tube, and 7) mucosal injury. Thirty male and 60 female (ASA physical status I-II; 18-80 yr old) anesthetized, paralyzed patients were studied in a crossover fashion in three equal-sized groups. PLMA insertion was performed by a single experienced operator by using digital manipulation. In male patients comparing the Size 4 and 5, OLP was higher (P = 0.0002) and leak fraction lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 5, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. In female patients comparing the Size 4 and 5 PLMA, OLP was higher for the Size 5 (P < 0.0001), but the number of insertion attempts was fewer (P = 0.02), insertion time was quicker (P = 0.02), and there was less mucosal injury (P = 0.01) with the Size 4. There were no differences in anatomic position, gas exchange, or location of gas leak. In female patients comparing the Size 3 and 4 PLMA, OLP was higher (P = 0.0005) and leak fraction was lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 4, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. There were no episodes of failed oxygenation, failed ventilation, or gastric insufflation. We conclude that if size is selected by sex, the Size 4 PLMA is preferable for women and the Size 5 PLMA for men. ⋯ When sex is used to select the appropriate size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, the Size 4 ProSeal is preferable for women and the Size 5 ProSeal for men.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialThe relationship of posttetanic count and train-of-four responses during recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.
Posttetanic count (PTC) has been used to quantify intense degrees of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Our objective in the present investigation was to discern whether PTC correlates with recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade under both inhaled and IV anesthesia. In 60 patients, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 micro g/kg IV. Recovery from intense neuromuscular blockade induced by cisatracurium (0.15 mg/kg) was studied in 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with propofol 100-200 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 60% N(2)O in O(2), whereas Group 2 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.8%) and 60% N(2)O in O(2). Neuromuscular functions were monitored using acceleromyography. Cycles of posttetanic stimulation were repeated every 6 min with train-of-four (TOF) stimulation in between. Measurement included times to posttetanic responses and to the first response to TOF stimulation (T(1)), as well as the correlation between PTC and T(1). In Group 1, the mean times to PTC(1) and T(1) were 35.6 +/- 7.5 and 46.9 +/- 6.5 min, respectively. Corresponding times in Group 2 were 39.5 +/- 6.8 and 56.7 +/- 5.4 min, respectively. There was a good time correlation, r = 0.919 for propofol (Group 1) and r = 0.779 for isoflurane (Group 2), between PTC and T(1) recovery in both groups. The PTC when T(1) appeared ranged between 8 and 9 in Group 1 and 8 and 14 in Group 2. Conforming to original observations with other neuromuscular blocking drugs, there is a correlation between PTC and TOF recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade allowing better monitoring of this intense degree of blockade during both IV (propofol) and isoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ Monitoring posttetanic count during intense neuromuscular blockade allows the clinician to estimate the intensity of the blockade and estimate recovery time. The relationship between posttetanic count and train-of-four recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was documented under both IV and inhaled anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Comparative StudyThe relative toxicity of amitriptyline, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine administered as rapid infusions in rats.
Intravascular injection of local anesthetics carries the risk of cardiovascular (CV) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic potency that is more than that of bupivacaine. In this study, we compared the CV and CNS toxicity of the local anesthetics bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with that of amitriptyline. Twenty-nine Sprague-Dawley rats had their right external jugular vein and carotid artery cannulated under general anesthesia. On Day 2, rats were sedated with midazolam (0.375 mg/kg intraperitoneally) and received rapid infusions of either 1) bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or amitriptyline at 2 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (5 mg/mL concentration) or 2) normal saline (400 micro L x kg(-1) x min(-1)) through an external jugular vein cannula. Electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure were measured until the dose to cause impending death was reached (heart rate 50 bpm/asystole or apnea for >30 s). The mean dose required to cause apnea and impending death was significantly larger for amitriptyline (74.0 +/- 21 mg/kg and 74.5 +/- 21 mg/kg, respectively) than for levobupivacaine (32.2 +/- 20 mg/kg and 33.9 +/- 22 mg/kg, respectively) or bupivacaine (21.5 +/- 7 mg/kg and 22.7 +/- 7 mg/kg, respectively) (P < 0.05). A significantly larger dose of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, is required to cause CV and CNS toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine. ⋯ Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic properties and is more potent than bupivacaine. Significantly larger doses of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, are required to cause cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Case ReportsLocal anesthetic switching for intrathecal tachyphylaxis in cancer patients with pain.
Switching from bupivacaine to lidocaine may improve intrathecal morphine analgesia in advanced cancer patients, possibly because of different spinal mechanisms limiting the hyperalgesic processes.