Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2004
ReviewPreoperative evaluation of pediatric surgical patients with multisystem considerations.
Fewer and fewer patients spend time in the hospital in advance of a surgical or interventional procedure requiring anesthesia care. As a result, there is increasing reliance on a thorough preoperative evaluation directed toward identifying anesthetic risks. ⋯ The justification for the cost of this type of program is the savings realized by the decrease in wasted operating room time due to inadequate or incomplete patient preparation. The following is a description of a successful perioperative evaluation and preparation process that has been in place for 7 yr in a major pediatric academic institution.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAnalgesia before performing a spinal block in the sitting position in patients with femoral shaft fracture: a comparison between femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl.
We conducted this prospective, randomized study to compare the analgesic effect of femoral nerve block and IV fentanyl administration when given to facilitate the sitting position for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femoral shaft fracture. Five minutes before the placement of spinal block, group FEM patients (n = 10) received a femoral nerve block with lidocaine 1.5% 15 mL, and group IVA patients (n = 10) received IV fentanyl 3 microg/kg. Visual analog scale values during positioning (median and range) were lower in group FEM: 0.5 (0-1) versus 3 (2-6) (P < 0.001). ⋯ Patient acceptance was less in group IVA (P < 0.05). In one group IVA patient, an oxygen saturation <90% was recorded during the procedure. We conclude that femoral nerve block is more advantageous than IV administration of fentanyl to facilitate the sitting position for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femoral shaft fractures.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe pharmacodynamic effects of rocuronium when dosed according to real body weight or ideal body weight in morbidly obese patients.
We investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of rocuronium on morbidly obese patients. Twelve morbidly obese female patients (body mass index >40 kg/m(2)) admitted for laparoscopic gastric banding were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 6) received 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium based on real body weight, whereas Group 2 (n = 6) received 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium based on ideal body weight. ⋯ Recovery index tended to be longer in Group 1, but without a significant difference. In conclusion, in morbidly obese patients, the duration of action of rocuronium is significantly prolonged when it is dosed according to real body weight. Therefore, the dosage should be assessed on the basis of ideal rather than on real body weight in clinical practice.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTactile assessment for the reversibility of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.
We sought to determine whether tactile train-of-four (TOF) count can predict the efficacy of neostigmine administration for rocuronium-induced blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia, and to follow subsequent recovery until the TOF ratio reached 0.9. One-hundred-sixty patients, divided into eight equal groups, were randomly allocated to maintenance of anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane. The tactile response of the adductor pollicis to TOF stimulation was evaluated on one arm, and the mechanomyographic response was recorded on the other. ⋯ The times [median (range)] to TOF ratio = 0.9 were 8.6 (4.7-18.9), 7.5 (3.4-9.8), 5.4 (1.6-8.6), and 4.7 (1.3-7.2) min in Groups I-IV during propofol anesthesia, respectively, and 28.6 (8.8-75.8), 22.6 (8.3-57.4), 15.6 (7.3-43.9), and 9.7 (5.1-26.4) min in corresponding groups during sevoflurane anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.0001). We recommend more than 2 TOF responses with propofol anesthesia and 4 TOF responses with sevoflurane anesthesia for adequate reversal within 10 and 15 min, respectively. The more tactile TOF responses present at the time of reversal achieved greater adequate recovery; however, tactile TOF responses are not a completely reliable predictor within a reasonable time period.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized controlled comparison of electro-acupoint stimulation or ondansetron versus placebo for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
In this study we evaluated the efficacy of electro-acupoint stimulation, ondansetron versus placebo for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Patients undergoing major breast surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into active electro-acupoint stimulation (A), ondansetron 4 mg IV (O), or sham control (placement of electrodes without electro-acupoint stimulation; placebo [P]). The anesthetic regimen was standardized. ⋯ Patients in the treatment groups were more satisfied with their management of PONV compared with placebo. When used for the prevention of PONV, electro-acupoint stimulation or ondansetron was more effective than placebo with greater degree of patient satisfaction, but electro-acupoint stimulation seems to be more effective in controlling nausea, compared with ondansetron. Stimulation at P6 also has analgesic effects.