Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEmergence and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in morbidly obese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized study.
We compared postoperative recovery after desflurane (n = 25) versus sevoflurane (n = 25) anesthesia in morbidly obese adults (body mass index >/=35) who underwent gastrointestinal bypass surgery via an open laparotomy. After premedication with midazolam and metoclopramide 1 h before surgery, epidural catheter placement, induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol, and tracheal intubation facilitated with succinylcholine, anesthesia was maintained with age-adjusted 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane or sevoflurane. Fentanyl IV, morphine or local anesthetics epidurally, and vasoactive drugs as needed were used to maintain arterial blood pressure at +/-20% of baseline value and to keep bispectral index of the electroencephalogram values between 40 to 60 U. ⋯ On admission to PACU, patients given desflurane had higher oxygen saturations (97.0% +/- 2.4%) than patients given sevoflurane (94.8% +/- 4.4%, P = 0.035). Overall, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the use of antiemetics did not differ between the two anesthetic groups. We conclude that morbidly obese adult patients who underwent major abdominal surgery in a prospective, randomized study awoke significantly faster after desflurane than after sevoflurane anesthesia and the patients anesthetized with desflurane had higher oxygen saturation on entry to the PACU.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of epidural bupivacaine on induction and maintenance doses of propofol (evaluated by bispectral index) and maintenance doses of fentanyl and vecuronium.
The growing interest in combining local and general anesthesia has led to studies investigating possible interactions between general anesthesia and local anesthetics administered via spinal, epidural, IV, or IM routes. However, no study has evaluated the effect of local anesthetics on all three components of balanced anesthesia, i.e., hypnosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we investigated the effect of epidural bupivacaine on the dose requirement of propofol (as evaluated by using the bispectral index [BIS]), fentanyl, and vecuronium for general anesthesia. ⋯ The requirement of propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in the bupivacaine group was 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/kg and 2.4 +/- 0.9 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1), respectively, compared with 2.4 +/- 0.6 mg/kg and 4.4 +/- 1.6 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) observed in the control group (P < 0.05). Significant reduction was also observed in the requirement of vecuronium and fentanyl during maintenance in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.05). We conclude that epidural bupivacaine given before induction of anesthesia reduces the requirement of propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium during general anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSevoflurane decreases bispectral index values more than does halothane at equal MAC multiples.
At the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetics, 50% of subjects move in response to noxious stimulation. Similarly, at MAC-awake, 50% of subjects respond appropriately to command. The bispectral index (BIS) nominally measures the effect of anesthetics on wakefulness or consciousness. ⋯ BIS values in awake patients did not differ between the sevoflurane and halothane groups (96 +/- 2 and 96 +/- 2, mean +/- sd, respectively). At 1 MAC without and with neuromuscular blockade and at 1.5 MAC, BIS values for patients anesthetized with halothane (54 +/- 7, 56 +/- 7, and 49 +/- 7, respectively) exceeded those for patients anesthetized with sevoflurane (34 +/- 6, 34 +/- 6, and 29 +/- 5, respectively) (P < 0.0001). This finding adds to other evidence indicating that BIS is drug specific.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of selective spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and general anesthesia with desflurane for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
In this randomized and controlled trial, 64 adult ambulatory knee arthroscopy patients received either selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) with 4 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or general anesthesia (GA) with desflurane. We conducted the study to determine whether SSA with small-dose bupivacaine provides equal fast-tracking possibilities, a shorter stay in the postanesthesia care unit, and earlier discharge home compared with GA with desflurane. Patients with a high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting received prophylaxis in the GA group. ⋯ In the hospital, the pain scores were significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the SSA group compared with the GA group and the need for postoperative opioids was significantly (P = 0.008) larger after GA. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 0% versus 19% in the SSA and GA groups (P = 0.024), respectively. We conclude that for outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy, SSA with hyperbaric bupivacaine provides equal recovery times with less frequent side effects compared with GA with desflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe postoperative blood-sparing efficacy of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid after total knee replacement.
To assess the blood-sparing efficacy of tranexamic acid (TA) administered orally or via a variable IV infusion, 80 healthy patients undergoing elective total knee replacement were studied according to a prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded study design. Patients were allocated to one of four treatment groups. In group TA-long, 30 min before deflation of the limb tourniquet, an IV bolus dose of TA 15 mg/kg was administered over 30 min. ⋯ In the control group, TA was not administered. At patient discharge, postoperative allogeneic blood administration was significantly more in group Control when compared with each of the three TA treatment groups. Because oral drug administration is simple and does not require specific infusion equipment, the authors suggest that oral TA is a superior blood-sparing strategy compared with IV drug administration.