Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Letter Case ReportsBIS sensor electrodes can cause skin lesions: case report.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative parenteral parecoxib and follow-up oral valdecoxib reduce length of stay and improve quality of patient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the effects of preoperative IV parecoxib sodium (parecoxib) followed by postoperative oral valdecoxib on length of stay, resource utilization, opioid-related side effects, and patient recovery after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomized to receive a single IV dose of parecoxib 40 mg (n = 134) or placebo (n = 129) 30-45 min before the induction of anesthesia. Six to 12 h after the IV dose, the parecoxib group received a single oral dose of valdecoxib 40 mg, followed by valdecoxib 40 mg once daily on postoperative Days 1-4 and then 40 mg once daily as needed on Days 5-7. Patients in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group had a shorter length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (78 +/- 47 min) compared with those taking placebo (90 +/- 49 min; P < 0.05). Patients in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group also had reduced pain intensity and, after discharge, experienced a significant reduction in vomiting in the first 24 h, slept better, returned to normal activity earlier, and expressed greater satisfaction than placebo patients (P < 0.05). Preoperative parecoxib followed by postoperative valdecoxib is a valuable adjunct for treating pain and improving patient outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ⋯ The administration of preoperative IV parecoxib followed by oral valdecoxib after surgery resulted in a shorter length of stay in the postoperative anesthesia care unit, a better quality of postoperative recovery, and a faster return to normal activity, with greater patient satisfaction, after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators.
Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. ⋯ Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe synergistic effect of combined treatment with systemic ketamine and morphine on experimentally induced windup-like pain in humans.
In this study, we evaluated whether combined treatment with ketamine (KET), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, and morphine (MO) results in positive analgesic effects. Eleven volunteers were exposed to a skin burn injury on the leg. The effects of IV KET (9 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); 45 min) and MO (10 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); 10 min) alone and in combination, as well as placebo (saline; 10 min), were studied in a randomized, crossover, double-blinded design. The area of secondary hyperalgesia (SH) for mechanical stimulation was diminished by KET as compared with placebo. Mechanical pain thresholds were increased severalfold with KET and with KET plus MO, both in the primary hyperalgesic (PH; burn injury) and SH area. MO infusion showed no effect on the SH area or pain threshold. Windup-like pain was evaluated by continuous assessment on a visual analog scale during 30 s of repetitive stimulation (40-g load at 3 Hz) and analyzed as a sum of pain scores. The combined treatment (KET plus MO) almost abolished windup-like pain both in the PH and the SH areas, an effect that was not present with monotherapy with KET or MO. This study provides experimental support for a positive analgesic interaction between an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist and an opioid on central summation of pain. ⋯ This is the first experimental study in humans to find synergistic analgesic effects with coadministration of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine and morphine on pain involving central sensitization phenomena.