Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
A simple, fast, easy method to identify the evidence base in pain-relief research: validation of a computer search strategy used alone to identify quality randomized controlled trials.
Clinicians need a simple, fast, reliable, and inexpensive way of identifying the evidence base relevant to their clinical practice. It is often believed that the only way to identify all relevant evidence is to perform hand-searches of the literature to supplement computer searches; this is complex and labor intensive. However, most of quality randomized controlled trials cited in systematic reviews in pain medicine are listed in computer databases. We performed two studies to investigate the efficiency-in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and precision-of three computer search strategies: Optimally Sensitive Search Strategy, which is used by the Cochrane Collaboration; RCT.pt, a standard MEDLINE strategy; and DBRCT.af, which is a new single-line computer algorithm based on the assumption that double-blinded, randomized controlled trials would be indexed with "double-blind," "random," or variations of these terms in MEDLINE and EMBASE. DBRCT.af was found to be highly sensitive (97%) in identifying quality randomized controlled trials in pain medicine. The precision (ratio of randomized controlled trials to the number of nonrandomized trials identified) was 82%, and the specificity in excluding the nonrandomized controlled trials was 98%. We conclude that clinicians can now use DBRCT.af to update and conduct de novo systematic reviews in pain-relief research. ⋯ Quality evidence about what is good clinical practice in pain treatment is buried in the medical literature among large quantities of other information. This article describes how any clinician with access to the Internet can identify those quality studies reliably, quickly, and inexpensively.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Comparative StudyTreatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after liver trauma: fatal effects of fluid resuscitation versus improved outcome after vasopressin.
In a porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, we evaluated the effects of vasopressin versus an equal volume of saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation on hemodynamic variables and short-term survival. Twenty-one anesthetized pigs were subjected to severe liver injury. When mean arterial blood pressure was <20 mm Hg and heart rate decreased, pigs randomly received either vasopressin IV (0.4 U/kg; n = 7), an equal volume of saline placebo (n = 7), or fluid resuscitation (1000 mL each of lactated Ringer's solution and hetastarch; n = 7). Thirty minutes after intervention, surviving pigs were fluid resuscitated while bleeding was surgically controlled. Mean (+/- SEM) arterial blood pressure 5 min after the intervention was significantly (P < 0.05) higher after vasopressin than with saline placebo or fluid resuscitation (58 +/- 9 versus 7 +/- 3 versus 32 +/- 6 mm Hg, respectively). Vasopressin improved abdominal organ blood flow but did not cause further blood loss (vasopressin versus saline placebo versus fluid resuscitation 10 min after intervention, 1343 +/- 60 versus 1350 +/- 22 versus 2536 +/- 93 mL, respectively; P < 0.01). Seven of 7 vasopressin pigs survived until bleeding was controlled and 60 min thereafter, whereas 7 of 7 saline placebo and 7 of 7 fluid resuscitation pigs died (P < 0.01). We conclude that vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, significantly improves short-term survival during uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. ⋯ Although IV fluid administration is the mainstay of nonsurgical management of trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, the efficacy of this strategy has been discussed controversially. In this animal model of severe liver trauma with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, vasopressin, but not saline placebo or fluid resuscitation, improved short-term survival.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Case ReportsUse of continuous paravertebral analgesia to facilitate neurologic assessment and enhance recovery after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Neurologic assessment after thoracic aortic aneurysm repair is important for detecting and treating late onset paraplegia. Traditional methods of pain control, such as patient-controlled IV analgesia and epidural analgesia, may interfere with neurologic assessment. We present a case of a patient who received continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia that provided excellent analgesia while preserving the ability to monitor neurologic function. ⋯ We provided postoperative continuous paravertebral analgesia in a patient after thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair requiring postoperative neurologic assessment. Paravertebral analgesia provides unilateral analgesia with fewer neurologic and hemodynamic side effects than central neuraxial blockade and should be considered for management of patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Case ReportsSuperficial cervical plexus block for vocal cord surgery in an awake pediatric patient.
Medialization thyroplasty is a surgical procedure that decreases the incidence of dysphonia and dysphagia in patients who have vocal cord paralysis. We report a case of a pediatric patient who underwent this procedure with minimal sedation and bilateral superficial cervical plexus blockade. The use of a regional technique provided analgesia while allowing the patient to phonate at the request of the surgeon. ⋯ Medialization thyroplasty is a surgical procedure that decreases the incidence of dysphagia and dysphonia in patients with vocal cord paralysis. This procedure is best performed in a patient who maintains the ability to phonate. We report a case of medialization thyroplasty in a pediatric patient after bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks with minimal sedation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Case ReportsPerioperative pain management of a complex orthopedic surgical procedure with double continuous nerve blocks in a burned child.
The use of catheters for continuous nerve blocks has been established in children, although in most series only one catheter was used. We report a case of a 3-yr-old child who underwent a toe-to-finger transfer managed with 2 regional catheters: axillary and sciatic. A pain score of 0 was noted during the entire study period. The total dose of bupivacaine was limited to an acceptable range, and the child recovered completely. This report adds to growing evidence in favor of the safety and efficacy of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in pediatric patients. ⋯ Double continuous nerve blocks allow optimal analgesia in burned children after complex orthopedic surgery without major adverse events. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine remained small during the study period.