Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialThe potency (ED50) and cardiovascular effects of rapacuronium (Org 9487) during narcotic-nitrous oxide-propofol anesthesia in neonates, infants, and children.
We studied the neuromuscular blocking effects of rapacuronium (Org 9487) (dose-response curve, onset, and 50% effective dose [ED50] value), and changes in heart rate and blood pressure, as well as evidence of histamine release in neonates, infants, and children in an open-label, randomized, two-center study. Fifteen neonates, 30 infants, and 30 children were studied. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, nitrous oxide:oxygen (60:40), and fentanyl. Mechanomyographic monitoring of neuromuscular function was performed at the thumb. The potency (ED50) for neonates, infants, and children were 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.61), 0.28 (95% CI 0.11-0.61), and 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.85) mg/kg, respectively. Neonates who received 0.3, 0.6, or 0.9 mg/kg Org 9487 developed a maximum T1 twitch depression of 34 +/-28%, 98 +/- 3%, and 99 +/- 2%, respectively. Time-to-peak effect (onset time) for 0.9 mg/kg Org 9487 was 57 +/- 20 s. Maximum percent T1 twitch depression (+/-SD) in infants who received 0.3, 0.6, or 0.9 mg/kg rapacuronium was 41 +/- 34%, 96 +/- 7%, and 100 +/- 1%, respectively. Time-to-peak effect for 0.9 mg/kg Org 9487 was 62 +/- 29 s. In children 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 mg/kg rapacuronium resulted in an average percent T1 twitch suppression of 29 +/- 23, 83 +/- 11, and 90 +/- 16, respectively. Time-to-peak effect of 0.9 mg/kg Org 9487 was 96 +/- 33 s, respectively. There was no evidence of histamine release or significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure in either group at any dose. Rapacuronium is a low-potency nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with a fast onset of relaxation and minimal cardiovascular effects. Its potency (ED50) is similar in neonates (0.32 mg/kg), infants (0.28 mg/kg), and children (0.39 mg/kg). T1 suppression (90% +/- 16) is less and time to peak effect (96 +/- 33 s) is greater (0.9 mg/kg rapacuronium) in children, compared with the combined group of infants and neonates. ⋯ This study assesses the potency of rapacuronium (Org 9487) in pediatric patients. The potency of rapacuronium is similar in neonates (0.32 mg/kg), infants (0.28 mg/kg), and children (0.39 mg/kg).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialInhaled nitric oxide versus intravenous vasodilators in severe pulmonary hypertension after cardiac surgery.
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is superior to i.v. vasodilators for treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) after cardiac surgery, but iNO is a potentially toxic gas, and patient subsets who benefit from iNO are not yet clearly defined. We administered iNO 40 ppm, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) 0.1 microg x kg(-1) min(-1), and nitroglycerin (NTG) 3 to 5 microg x kg(-1) min(-1), in a randomized crossover study to 14 adult patients with severe PH after cardiac surgery. iNO, PGE1, and NTG were of similar efficacy in reducing pulmonary vascular resistance (P = 0.003). iNO induced selective pulmonary vasodilation, while PGE1 and NTG had significant concomitant systemic vasodilatory effects. iNO led to an increase in cardiac index (CI) (P = 0.012), and PGE1 increased CI (P = 0.006) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (P = 0.015), while NTG had no effect on CI and RV performance. After study completion, patients continued with PGE1 administration with favorable in-hospital outcome. We conclude that PH per se, even if severe, does not necessarily imply postoperative RV dysfunction, and selective pulmonary vasodilation with iNO may not be superior to PGE1 with regard to CI and RV performance. ⋯ In a prospective, randomized crossover study of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) versus IV vasodilators, performed in adult patients with severe pulmonary hypertension but preserved right ventricular function after cardiac surgery, iNO was not superior to IV prostaglandin E1 with regard to cardiac index and right ventricular performance. Considering the potential toxicity of iNO, better definition of patient subsets with a positive benefit/risk ratio is warranted.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTwo doses of intrathecal sufentanil (2.5 and 5 microg) combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine for labor analgesia.
In this study, we evaluated the effect of two doses of intrathecal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine on the incidence of pruritus and on the duration and quality of analgesia. One hundred five parturients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. They received either intrathecal 1.25 mg bupivacaine and 25 microg epinephrine (control group); 1.25 mg bupivacaine, 25 microg epinephrine, and 2.5 microg sufentanil (2.5-microg group); or 1.25 mg bupivacaine, 25 microg epinephrine, and 5 microg (5-microg group). Pain relief was assessed 10 min after injection, and pruritus was recorded at 30 min by a blinded observer. The study ended when the parturients requested further analgesia. There were no demographic differences among groups. Ninety of 103 parturients achieved complete pain relief with the initial dose, 11 patients in the control group (P < 0.004, control versus both sufentanil groups), and 2 patients in the 2.5-microg group needed a supplemental epidural bupivacaine. Pruritus was absent in the control group (P < 0.0001, control versus both sufentanil groups), whereas it was present in 36% of the 2.5-microg group and in 66% of the 5-microg group (P = 0.015, 2.5-microg versus 5-microg group). The mean duration of analgesia was similar in patients receiving sufentanil (2.5-microg group: 133 +/- 55 min; 5-microg group: 142 +/- 52 min) but was significantly higher than the control group (56 +/- 32 min). Reducing the sufentanil dose from 5 microg to 2.5 microg when combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine, decreases the incidence of pruritus without impeding the quality or duration of analgesia. ⋯ We evaluated two different doses of intrathecal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine and epinephrine for labor analgesia. Sufentanil 2.5 microg offered an advantage over sufentanil 5 microg because, while providing the same quality and duration of analgesia, it was associated with a reduced incidence of pruritus.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialExpression of genes for proinflammatory cytokines in alveolar macrophages during propofol and isoflurane anesthesia.
Anesthesia and surgery induce macrophage aggregation and neutrophil influx, responses that characterize an inflammatory reaction in the distal airway. We thus evaluated the time-dependent expression of genes for proinflammatory cytokines during propofol and isoflurane anesthesia. We studied patients anesthetized with propofol (n = 20) or isoflurane (n = 20). Alveolar macrophages were harvested by bronchoalveolar lavage immediately, 2, 4, and 6 h after induction of anesthesia, and at the end of surgery. RNA was extracted from harvested cells and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription. Expression of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, IL-8, interferon gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha was measured by semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction using beta-actin as an internal standard. We observed two 10-fold increases in gene expression of all proinflammatory cytokines except IL-6. The increases in IL-8 and interferon gamma were 1.5-3 times greater during isoflurane than propofol anesthesia. Expression of the genes for IL-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha was similar with each anesthetic. Our data thus indicate that the pulmonary inflammatory response accompanying anesthesia and surgery is accompanied by the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, and that this expression was in some cases greater during isoflurane than propofol anesthesia. ⋯ Gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in alveolar macrophages increased significantly over time. The increases were greater during isoflurane than propofol anesthesia, suggesting that inflammatory responses at transcriptional levels in alveolar macrophages are modulated by the type and duration of anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effective dose of dexamethasone for antiemesis after major gynecological surgery.
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the minimum effective dose of dexamethasone for postoperative antiemesis. One-hundred fifty women scheduled for major gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone 10 mg (D10), 5 mg (D5), 2.5 mg (D2.5), 1.25 mg (D1.25), or placebo (P) before the induction of general anesthesia. A standardized general anesthesia technique was used. Postoperative pain was treated with bolus IV doses of morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Patients were assessed for incidence of vomiting at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery. A total of 6, 6, 8, 15, and 19 patients in Groups D10, D5, D2.5, D1.25, and Group P experienced vomiting at least once within the first postoperative 24 h, respectively. Dexamethasone 10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg was more effective than dexamethasone 1.25 mg or placebo for antiemesis (P < 0.05). The difference in antiemetic effect among the 10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg groups was similar. The results suggest that 2.5 mg is the minimum effective dose of dexamethasone for postoperative antiemesis in patients undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery. ⋯ Although dexamethasone is effective for antiemesis, major side effects may accompany its perioperative use. To achieve the best antiemesis with the fewest side effects, dexamethasone 10 mg, 5 mg, 2.5 mg, and 1.25 mg were compared with placebo in surgical patients. We found 2.5 mg to be the minimum effective dose without discernible side effects.