Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAutoregulation of human inner ear blood flow during middle ear surgery with propofol or isoflurane anesthesia during controlled hypotension.
We used controlled hypotension to obtain a bloodless cavity during middle ear surgery under an optical microscope. No previous study has assessed the effect of controlled hypotension on inner ear blood flow (IEF) autoregulation in humans receiving propofol or isoflurane anesthesia. In the present study, the IEF autoregulation was determined using laser Doppler flowmetry in combination with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) during controlled hypotension with sodium nitroprusside in 20 patients randomly anesthetized with propofol or isoflurane. A coefficient of IEF autoregulation (Ga) was determined during controlled hypotension, with a Ga value ranging between 0 (no autoregulation) and 1 (perfect autoregulation). During controlled hypotension with propofol, IEF remained stable (1%+/-6%; P > 0.05) but decreased by 25%+/-8% with isoflurane (P < 0.05). The Ga was higher during propofol anesthesia (0.62+/-0.03) than during isoflurane anesthesia (0.22+/-0.03; P < 0.0001). Under propofol anesthesia, there were individual relationships between TEOAE amplitude and change in IEF in four patients. Such a correlation was not observed under isoflurane anesthesia. These results suggest that human IEF is autoregulated in response to decreased systemic pressure. Furthermore, isoflurane has a greater propensity to decrease cochlear autoregulation and function than propofol. ⋯ The present study shows that inner ear blood flow is autoregulated under propofol, but not isoflurane, anesthesia during controlled hypotension in humans during middle ear surgery. Further studies are needed to explore the postoperative auditory functional consequences of the choice of the anesthetic drug used in middle ear surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide enhances the analgesic efficacy of morphine in humans with chronic benign pain.
The analgesic efficacy of morphine is sometimes only partial in patients with chronic benign pain. Among the possible factors contributing to this limitation are increased levels of cholecystokinin (CCK). We performed this prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study to examine the effect of proglumide, a nonspecific CCK agonist, on analgesia in patients taking morphine on a chronic basis. Forty patients with intractable pain who were taking sustained-release morphine were recruited, and we obtained results from 36 of these patients. Median visual analog scale scores before the study were 8 and 7 after the addition of placebo for 2 wk (P = 0.16), and 6 after proglumide for 2 wk (P = 0.002). Mobility was unchanged by proglumide or placebo. Of the 36 patients, 13 elected to continue receiving proglumide after the study. We conclude that proglumide enhances the analgesia produced by morphine in some, but not all, patients with chronic benign pain. ⋯ The pain-killing effect of morphine is incomplete in some patients. Increasing doses may be needed to maintain the initial effect. The peptide cholecystokinin may be partially responsible for this. In this study, we demonstrated that the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide increases the analgesic effect of morphine in some patients with chronic benign pain.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1998
Clinical TrialRespiratory effects of desflurane anesthesia on spontaneous ventilation in infants and children.
Volatile anesthetics depress spontaneous ventilation in a dose-dependent manner with variations in effects among different drugs. The goal of this prospective study was to assess respiratory changes during spontaneous ventilation using desflurane/O2/N2O anesthesia in two groups of children. Both groups were undergoing minor surgery and consisted of children < 2 yr old (Group I) and children > 2 yr old (Group II). They were examined at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration desflurane anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia was performed via a face mask and a mixture of O2/N2O (40:60) with halothane. At lease 20 min after stopping halothane, the respiratory variables were recorded on desflurane anesthesia. Tidal volume and minute ventilation decreased significantly (P <0.05) as desflurane increased from 0.5 to 1.5 MAC in both groups. At 1.5 MAC, the respiratory rate was greater in Group II than in Group I (P <0.05). In both groups, the increase in end-tidal CO2 was significant at 1.5 MAC versus 1 and 0.5 MAC (P <0.05). Apnea, i.e., no respiratory movement for 20 s, occurred at 1.5 MAC in one patient in each group. The respiratory duty cycle did not change in any of the groups. Both indices of paradoxical respiration--amplitude index and delay index--did not change. ⋯ Desflurane induces respiratory depression at concentrations higher than 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration mainly due to a decrease in tidal volume. Therefore, desflurane at high concentrations should be used cautiously in infants and children with spontaneous ventilation.