Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialNeuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia.
The potency and time course of action of rocuronium were studied in patients anesthetized with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or isoflurane, or a propofol infusion. Potency was estimated by using the single-bolus technique. Neuromuscular block was measured by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. The mean (95% confidence limits) of the 50% and 95% effective doses were estimated tobe 142 (129-157) and 265 (233-301) microg/ kg, 165 (146-187) and 324 (265-396) microg/kg, and 183 (163-207) and 398 (316-502) microg/kg during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.05 for sevoflurane versus propofol). The mean +/- SD times to onset of maximal block after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were 0.96 +/- 0.16, 0.90 +/- 0.16, and 1.02 +/- 0.15 min during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively. The respective times to recovery of the first response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (T1) to 25% and 90% were 45 +/- 13.1 and 83 +/- 29.3 min, 35 +/- 6.1 and 56 +/- 15.9 min, and 35 +/- 9.2 and 55 +/- 19.4 min. The times to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 103 +/- 30.7, 69 +/- 20.4, and 62 +/- 21.1 min, and the 25%-75% recovery indices were 26 +/- 11.7, 12 +/- 5.0, and 14 +/- 6.9 min, respectively. There were no differences among groups in the times for onset of action or to recovery of T1 to 25%. However, the times for recovery of T1 to 90%, TOF ratio to 0.8, and recovery index in the sevoflurane group were all significantly longer compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.01, respectively). We conclude that the effects of rocuronium, especially duration of action, are significantly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. ⋯ In routine clinical use, the effects of rocuronium are enhanced by sevoflurane, in comparison with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia, and the recovery is slower. Particular attention should be paid to monitoring of neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSingle-dose tropisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the efficacy of tropisetron 5 mg with tropisetron 2 mg for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after breast surgery. One hundred forty-eight female patients were randomized to receive either tropisetron 5 mg (n = 49), tropisetron 2 mg (n = 49), or saline (n = 50) before the induction of anesthesia with thiopental and morphine. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Postoperative analgesia was provided by patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine. The incidence of PONV, the pain score, and the analgesic requirement were recorded for 48 h. There was no difference among groups in patient characteristics, risk factors for PONV, morphine consumption, or side effects. During the first 6 h postoperatively, the incidence of PONV after tropisetron 2 mg and 5 mg were similar and were superior to placebo (P < 0.001). After 6 h, the incidence of PONV increased significantly in patients who had received tropisetron 2 mg (P = 0.01) and was greater than that in patients who had received tropisetron 5 mg (P = 0.001). We conclude that single-dose tropisetron 5 mg is more effective than tropisetron 2 mg in the prevention of PONV after breast surgery. ⋯ Breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A single dose of i.v. tropisetron 5 mg is well tolerated and decreases the number of vomiting and nausea episodes after surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDexamethasone decreases the incidence of shivering after cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Shivering after cardiac surgery is common, and may be a result of intraoperative hypothermia. Another possible etiology is fever and chills secondary to activation of the inflammatory response and release of cytokines by cardiopulmonary bypass. Dexamethasone decreases the gradient between core and skin temperature and modifies the inflammatory response. The goal of this study was to determine whether dexamethasone can reduce the incidence of shivering. Two hundred thirty-six patients scheduled for elective coronary and/or valvular surgery were randomly assigned to receive either dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or placebo after the induction of anesthesia. All patients received standard monitoring and anesthetic management. After arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU), nurses unaware of the treatment groups recorded visible shivering, as well as skin and pulmonary artery temperatures. Analysis of shivering rates was performed by using chi2 tests and logistic regression analysis. Compared with placebo, dexamethasone decreased the incidence of shivering (33.0% vs 13.1%; P = 0.001). It was an independent predictor of reduced incidence of shivering and was also associated with a higher skin temperature on ICU admission and a lower central temperature in the early postoperative period. ⋯ Dexamethasone is effective in decreasing the incidence of shivering. The effectiveness of dexamethasone is independent of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. Shivering after cardiac surgery may be part of the febrile response that occurs after release of cytokines during cardiopulmonary bypass.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe advantages of the lateral decubitus position after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric tetracaine.
We investigated the effects of lateral decubitus positioning after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric tetracaine on the spread of sensory blockade and hemodynamic variables. One hundred ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery to the lower limb received spinal anesthesia at a rate of approximately 0.1 mL/s using 0.5% tetracaine in 7.5% glucose with 0.125% phenylephrine in the lateral decubitus position with the operated side dependent. They were randomly divided into three groups: patients in Group I were placed supine immediately after spinal injection; those in Group II remained in the lateral position for 10 min before being turned supine; those in Group III were kept in the lateral position for 20 min then turned supine. Neural block was assessed by cold, pinprick, and touch sensation, and a modified Bromage scale. Hemodynamic variables included blood pressure, heart rate, and the use of ephedrine for the treatment of hypotension. The median (10th, 90th percentiles) peak dermatomal level to pinprick on the dependent side in Group III was T8 (T11, T5), which was significantly lower than that in Groups I and II, which extended to T4 (T9, T3) and T5 (T10, T2), respectively (P < 0.05). The difference in the maximal cephalad spread of sensory blockade between both sides in Group III was only one dermatome but was statistically significant (P < 0.05); in contrast, there was no significant difference in the maximal sensory level between both sides in Groups I and II. The use of ephedrine for the treatment of hypotension was significantly less frequent in Group III than the other groups. We conclude that keeping a patient in the lateral decubitus position for 20 min after hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia maintains preferential anesthetic distribution to the dependent side. Despite small differences between the two sides, the restricted spread of blockade and less hemodynamic variability may be clinically advantageous. ⋯ The effects of posture on the spread of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia have not been adequately investigated. The results of the present study suggest an advantage of prolonged lateral decubitus positioning after intrathecal hyperbaric tetracaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Protamine reversal of heparin affects platelet aggregation and activated clotting time after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is related to multiple factors. Excess protamine weakens clot structure and decreases platelet function; therefore, an increased activated clotting time (ACT) after protamine reversal of heparin may be misinterpreted as residual heparin anticoagulation. We evaluated the effects of protamine, recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4), and hexadimethrine on ACT in blood obtained after CPB. In addition, we examined the effect of protamine on in vitro platelet aggregation. Incremental doses of protamine, rPF4, and hexadimethrine were added to heparinized blood from CPB, and ACTs were performed. Incremental concentrations of protamine were added to heparinized platelet-rich plasma, and aggregometry was induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and collagen. The mean heparin concentration at the end of CPB was 3.3 U/mL. Protamine to heparin ratios >1.3:1 produced a significant prolongation of the ACT that was not seen with rPF4 and was observed only with 5:1 hexadimethrine to heparin ratios. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was reduced with protamine administration > or =1.3:1. Excessive protamine reversal of heparin prolongs ACT and alters ADP-induced platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner in vitro. Additional protamine administered to treat a prolonged ACT may further increase clotting time, reduce platelet aggregation, and potentially contribute to excess bleeding after CPB. ⋯ We found that excess protamine prolonged the activated clotting time and altered platelet function after cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas heparin antagonists, such as recombinant platelet factor 4 and hexadimethrine, exhibited a wider therapeutic range without adversely affecting the activated clotting time. Approaches to avoid excess protamine or use of alternative heparin antagonists after cardiopulmonary bypass may be beneficial.