Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreemptive caudal bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia in children.
We designed this double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive epidural bupivacaine and small-dose morphine for postoperative analgesia in children after herniorraphy. Sixty children, ASA physical status I or II, who were undergoing elective hernia repair under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I (preemptive group) received 0.66 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine with morphine 0.02 mg/kg caudally after the induction of anesthesia but 15 min before surgery. Group II (postincisional group) received the same drug mixture after surgery. Pain was assessed using an objective pain scale (OPS). Time to first postoperative analgesics (TFA), the number of supplementary analgesic used, and the amount of morphine consumed over the ensuing 24-h period were noted. The OPS score was significantly less in Group I at 0.5, 4, and 8 h (P < 0.05) than in Group II after surgery. The median OPS score recorded over 24 h was 0 for Group I and 2 for Group II, which was significantly different (P < 0.05). The TFA in Group I (12.55 +/- 3.06 h) was significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged compared with Group II (10.62 +/- 3.18 h). The total postoperative morphine consumption in Group I (2.24 +/- 1.4 mg) was significantly (P < 0.05) less than that in Group II (3.34 +/- 2.29 mg). Nevertheless, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was not significantly different between the groups. In this study, we demonstrated that preemptive epidural bupivacaine and small-dose morphine administration is superior to the same mixture given at the conclusion of surgery for pain relief. ⋯ This study was performed on two groups of 30 children undergoing hernia repair. Group I received a bupivacaine-morphine mixture caudally before surgery, and Group II received the same drugs caudally at the completion of surgery. Postoperative assessment demonstrated longer and better pain relief in Group I.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialVisual evaluation of residual curarization in anesthetized patients using one hundred-hertz, five-second tetanic stimulation at the adductor pollicis muscle.
We were looking for a clinical test to indicate a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of approximately 0.9. We compared the adductor pollicis muscle (AP) visually evaluated response to ulnar nerve 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus (RF100 Hz) with the measured AP TOF ratio in 30 ASA physical status I or II adult anesthetized (propofol, sufentanil, N2O/O2) patients. After the induction of anesthesia, the left ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist (single twitch and TOF) and the resultant isometric force was measured. When TOF was assessed, the independent investigators, unaware of the left AP-measured TOF ratios, visually evaluated the presence or absence of AP fading elicited by right ulnar nerve 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus. The 30 patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.5 mg/kg atracurium (n = 15) or 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium (n = 15). The neuromuscular blockade was allowed to resolve spontaneously. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed by computing the 771 visual observations. The probabilities of success of 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus to detect TOF ratios of 0.8, 0.85, and 0.9 were 99%, 96%, and 67%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus as an indicator of TOF ratios of 0.85 and 0.9 are 100% and 75%, 54% and 67%, respectively. We conclude that RF100 Hz visual assessment seems to be highly sensitive in evaluating residual paralysis, as the absence of RF100 Hz visual fading at the AP is compatible with a TOF ratio > 0.85. ⋯ After the administration of muscle relaxants, the absence of visual fading at the adductor pollicis, elicited in anesthetized patients by 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus, is compatible with a train-of four ratio > 0.85. Therefore, clinical observation of fading after 100-Hz, 5-s tetanus seems to be a highly sensitive test in evaluating residual paralysis.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMagnesium sulfate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements.
In a randomized, double-blind study with two parallel groups, we assessed the analgesic effect of perioperative magnesium sulfate administration in 46 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery with total i.v. anesthesia. The patients received either magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg preoperatively and 8 mg.kg-1.h-1 intraoperatively or the same volume of isotonic sodium chloride solution i.v. Anesthesia was performed with propofol (2 mg/kg for induction, 6-8 mg.kg-1.h-1 for maintenance), fentanyl (3 micrograms/kg for induction), and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg for intubation). Intraoperative pain was defined as an increase of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate of more than 20% from baseline values after the induction of anesthesia and was treated with bolus fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg). Postoperative analgesia was achieved with fentanyl (0.5 microgram/kg) and evaluated using the pain visual analog scale for 4 h. During the intraoperative and postoperative periods, patients in the magnesium group required significantly less fentanyl than those in the control group (control group 0.089 +/- 0.02 microgram.kg-1.min-1 versus magnesium group 0.058 +/- 0.01 microgram.kg-1.min-1; P < 0.05 and control group 0.021 +/- 0.013 microgram.kg-1.min-1 and magnesium group 0.0031 +/- 0.0018 microgram.kg-1.min-1; P < 0.01 for intraoperative and postoperative periods, respectively). We conclude that, in a clinical setting with almost identical levels of surgical stimulation, i.v. magnesium sulfate administration reduces intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements compared with isotonic sodium chloride solution administration. ⋯ The perioperative administration of i.v. magnesium sulfate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements in patients with almost identical levels of surgical stimulus. Our results demonstrate that magnesium can be an adjuvant to perioperative analgesic management.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients.
We compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in 120 anesthetized adult patients. We compared 1) placement success rates, 2) airway interventional requirements, 3) airway stability in different head/neck positions, 4) cardiorespiratory tolerance, and 5) intra- and postoperative adverse events/symptoms. A standardized anesthesia protocol was followed by four anesthesiologists experienced with both devices. Observational data were validated by independent analysis of continuous video recordings. Postoperative interviews were double-blind to the device used. The LMA had a more frequent success rate than COPA (97% vs 55%, P < 0.00001), an overall higher success rate (100% vs 83%; P = 0.001), a shorter time to achieve an effective airway (49 vs 188 s; P < 0.00001), a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (21 vs 16 cm H2O; P = 0.003), and a fewer number of chin lift airway interventions required (0.1% vs 42%; P < 0.00001). When comparing mean tidal volumes in different head/neck positions to assess airway stability, the quality of airway was unchanged in 98% patients with the LMA and 54% with the COPA (P < 0.00001). The incidences of intraoperative adverse events were similar. On removal, blood was detected more often on the COPA (3% vs 14%; P = 0.04). In the late postoperative period, more patients complained of adverse symptoms with the COPA than with the LMA (26% vs 57%; P = 0.001). Late postoperative symptoms occurred more frequently with the COPA (0.87 vs 0.34; P = 0.003). There was more late postoperative sore throat (14% vs 36%; P = 0.0003) and more jaw/neck pain (12% vs 26%; P = 0.0008) in patients managed with the COPA. This study demonstrates that the LMA offers advantages over the COPA in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity. ⋯ In this randomized, prospective study, we compared the laryngeal mask airway and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized patients. The laryngeal mask airway offers advantages in most technical aspects of airway management and in terms of postoperative morbidity.