Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialProphylactic antiemetics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ondansetron versus droperidol plus metoclopramide.
Two hundred adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in a prospectively randomized, double-blind investigation comparing ondansetron, 4 mg (Group O) with the combination of droperidol, 0.625 mg, and metoclopramide, 10 mg (Group DM). Antiemetic drugs were administered intravenously (IV) after induction of general anesthesia (propofol, desflurane). Moderate or severe nausea in the postanesthesia care unit was treated with the cross-over drug, i.e., ondansetron for patients in Group DM or droperidol plus metoclopramide for patients in Group O. ⋯ Of 102 patients in Group O, 44 required antiemetics in the postanesthesia care unit, compared with 24 of 98 patients in Group DM (P < 0.01). One patient (in Group DM) was admitted for persistent nausea. In conclusion, droperidol 0.625 mg IV in combination with metoclopramide 10 mg IV was more effective in preventing postoperative nausea than was ondansetron 4 mg IV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with no difference in the time to discharge.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of intrathecal morphine-6-glucuronide and intrathecal morphine sulfate as analgesics for total hip replacement.
Postoperative analgesia was assessed after intrathecal administration of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) 100 micrograms and 125 micrograms in 75 patients undergoing total hip replacement. Analgesia was excellent and was similar to that obtained after intrathecal administration of morphine sulfate 500 micrograms. Visual analog pain scores recorded postoperatively were low (median = 0) and were similar in all three groups. ⋯ The lack of statistical significance in the difference in incidence of respiratory depression between the groups may represent a type II error. However, the risk of late respiratory depression developing after administration of any intrathecal opioid necessitates careful postoperative observation of patients. As M6G is a potent intrathecal analgesic further investigation of this drug using small doses may be useful.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients.
This study compares the emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in children undergoing adenoidectomy with bilateral myringotomy and the insertion of tubes. Eighty children 1-7 yr of age were studied. Thirty minutes prior to the induction of anesthesia, all patients received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam orally. ⋯ It is concluded that, although desflurane resulted in the fastest early emergence from anesthesia, it was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative agitation. Sevoflurane resulted in similar emergence and recovery compared with halothane. Desflurane and sevoflurane did not result in faster discharge times than halothane in this patient population.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of variable-dose patient-controlled analgesia with fixed-dose patient-controlled analgesia.
We examined the effect on the quality of analgesia and side effects of increasing the patient control component of morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) by offering the patient a choice of bolus dose sizes. Using a three-button hand piece, patients could choose between 0.5-, 1.0-, and 1.5-mg boluses of morphine (variable-dose PCA, VDPCA). Successful demands were delivered by a modified Graseby 3400 Anaesthesia Pump controlled by a Toshiba T1900 computer. ⋯ Treatment groups did not differ in their duration of PCA therapy, total morphine consumption, or time spent with mild or severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation. There were no differences in their ease of controlling pain, satisfaction with pain control, experience of pain on movement, quality of sleep, severity of nausea, or incidence of vomiting. Although the more complex VDPCA technique provides adequate postoperative analgesia, it does not offer any advantage over conventional FDPCA.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of isoflurane versus fentanyl as primary anesthetics for mitral valve surgery.
We conducted a randomize study of fentanyl compared to isoflurane anesthesia in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery. Patients were premedicated and randomly assigned to one of two groups: 21 patients had anesthesia induced with thiopental and maintained with isoflurane; 23 patients had anesthesia induced with a fentanyl bolus and maintained with a fentanyl infusion. Adjustments of fentanyl infusion and isoflurane concentration, as well as fentanyl boluses and vasoactive/positive inotropic medication, were administered to maintain preoperative arterial blood pressure. ⋯ Adequate hemodynamic profiles were achieved in both groups with comparable use of inotropic and vasoactive medication, with the exception of norepinephrine that was administered intraoperatively to significantly (P < 0.05) more patients in the isoflurane-based anesthesia group. Neither technique was associated with acute improvement of right heart performance or pulmonary hypertension, in large part because of morphologic changes of the pulmonary arterial bed, occurring with long-standing mitral valve disease. We conclude that isoflurane-based anesthesia is adequate for this type of surgery, although there is a higher anesthetic algorithm failure rate than with fentanyl-based anesthetic technique.