Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1998
Does the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass or aortic cross-clamp, in the absence of blood and/or blood product administration, influence the IL-6 response to cardiac surgery?
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces a systemic inflammatory response characterized by release of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6). Recent reports suggest that plasma IL-6 is increased after CPB. Previous studies evaluating the influence of duration of CPB and/or aortic cross-clamp time on the release of IL-6 are conflicting. Infusion of blood and blood products during these studies may have influenced plasma concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines by inducing host cell (monocyte) activation and IL-6 release. The purpose of our investigation was to determine, in an environment free from blood and/or blood product administration, the influence of duration of CPB and/or aortic cross-clamp on the magnitude of the IL-6 response in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We prospectively evaluated plasma IL-6 levels preinduction (T0) and at sternal closure in 16 patients undergoing CPB (coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 9; valvular cardiac surgery, n = 7) to determine whether there is a correlation between the absolute increase in IL-6 and the duration of CPB or aortic cross-clamp time. None of the patients received blood and/or blood products during the study to control for the introduction of additional activated cells and soluble mediators, including IL-6. The results demonstrate that the magnitude of the IL-6 response to CPB is positively correlated with the duration of CPB but not with duration of aortic cross-clamp. It seems that induction of IL-6 release is part of a normal response to CPB and does not depend on activation of host cells during prolonged aortic cross-clamp. The activation or presence of inflammatory cytokines associated with administration of blood and/or blood products could have influenced previously published investigations relating the influence of duration of CPB and/or aortic cross-clamp time to the magnitude of the IL-6 response. ⋯ This study found a positive correlation between the magnitude of the interleukin 6 response to cardiopulmonary bypass and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (but not duration of aortic cross-clamp) when measurements were made in the absence of blood/blood product transfusion. Future studies evaluating strategies to reduce cytokine responses to cardiopulmonary bypass should therefore control for cardiopulmonary bypass duration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1998
The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale.
The visual analog scale (VAS) has been used to assess the efficacy of pain management regimens in patients with acute postoperative pain, but its usefulness has not been confirmed in postoperative pain studies. We studied 60 subjects in the immediate postoperative period. The specific data collected were: VAS scores versus an 11-point numeric pain scale; repeatability in VAS scores over a short time interval; and change in VAS scores from one assessment period to the next versus a verbal report of change in pain. The correlation coefficients for VAS scores with the 11-point pain scale were 0.94, 0.91, and 0.95. The repeatability coefficients were 17.6, 23.0, and 13.5 mm. Of the 56 patients who completed all three assessments, only 16 (29%) had repeatability within 5 mm on all three. Some of the changes in VAS scores between assessments were in the direction opposite the verbally reported changes in pain (31%); however, most (92%) were within 20 mm. There was no correlation between the level of sedation, previous pain experience, anxiety, or anticipated pain with consistency in VAS scores. We conclude that any single VAS score in the immediate postoperative period should be considered to have an imprecision of +/- 20 mm. ⋯ The visual analog scale was developed for assessing chronic pain but is often used in studies of postoperative pain. This study finds that the visual analog scale correlates well with a verbal 11-point scale but that any individual determination has an imprecision of +/- 20 mm.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1998
In rats breathing from a nonrebreathing system, substitution of desflurane for isoflurane toward the end of anesthesia incompletely restores the time of recovery toward that of desflurane.
The lower solubility of desflurane allows a more rapid emergence from anesthesia than after anesthesia with the more soluble but less expensive anesthetic, isoflurane. Some practitioners use isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia, crossing over to desflurane later in maintenance in an attempt to combine the cost-effectiveness of isoflurane with the rapid emergence from desflurane. We hypothesized that this maneuver would not accomplish its goals. Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats received 1.2 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane for the final 15, 30, or 60 min of a 2-h, 1.2-MAC isoflurane anesthetic in a nonrebreathing anesthesia system. We measured the time from cessation of anesthetic administration to the time each rat righted himself twice. Immediately after righting for the second time, we tested each rat's ability to remain atop a rotating rod (Rota-Rod) for 60 s continuously. Early (righting reflex) and late (Rota-Rod) recovery occurred more rapidly (P < 0.001) after 120 min of anesthesia with desflurane alone than after 120 min of anesthesia with isoflurane alone. A cross-over period of 30 min or longer produced a righting reflex time that did not differ from that found with desflurane alone, but a 15-min cross-over did not. Progressively longer cross-over periods led to proportionally better Rota-Rod performance, but no cross-over duration produced the rapidity of recovery seen with desflurane alone. We concluded that in a nonrebreathing system, switching to desflurane during the last 30 min of anesthesia substantially improved early recovery but produced a much smaller improvement in later recovery. ⋯ The newer inhaled anesthetics offer the advantage of lower solubility, and thus more rapid emergence from anesthesia, than do the older inhaled anesthetics. However, they can be more expensive to use. This study demonstrates that substituting the newer anesthetic, desflurane, toward the end of anesthesia for an older anesthetic of greater solubility, isoflurane, does not produce recovery comparable to that of desflurane alone. Furthermore, this technique can be more costly than using desflurane throughout anesthesia.