The Annals of thoracic surgery
-
Although not currently approved for postoperative cardiac surgical bleeding, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used for this purpose. This study sought to analyze outcomes in patients who had cardiac surgical bleeding and received low-dose and early administration of rFVIIa versus outcomes in patients who had cardiac surgical bleeding and did not receive rFVIIa. ⋯ Low-dose and early administration of rFVIIa (median total dose 12 mcg/kg) for cardiac surgical bleeding shows potential in achieving hemostasis without increased risk of thromboembolism or acute kidney injury.
-
Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely applied to both peripheral and central lung cancer treatment in many centers, there is great hesitation to adopt it for carinal or tracheal surgical procedures. The aims of this study were to explore the feasibility of VATS in the treatment of benign and malignant diseases involving the carina and trachea and to highlight relevant techniques. ⋯ VATS resection and reconstruction of the carina or trachea are feasible, and these procedures can be safely performed using the techniques described. We believe, with the accumulation of VATS experience, these procedures could be adopted as routine approaches in tracheal surgery.
-
The stentless Freedom Solo aortic bioprosthesis is implanted supraannularly using one running suture line in the sinuses of Valsalva. We report our 9-year experience with this bioprosthesis. ⋯ Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo is safe and has a low rate of permanent pacemaker implantations and prosthesis-patient mismatch. Survival is comparable to that with other aortic bioprostheses, and structural valve deterioration and aortic valve reoperation are infrequent during midterm follow-up. Hemodynamic performance is excellent, with low valvular gradients that remain stable during follow-up.
-
Multicenter Study
Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Provides Excellent Outcomes Without Increased Cost: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) has grown in popularity. Although single centers have reported excellent outcomes, data on real-world outcomes and costs of mini-MVR are limited. Moreover, mini-MVR has been criticized as adding additional cost without clear benefit. We hypothesized that mini-MVR provides superior outcomes with incremental increased costs in a multi-institutional cohort. ⋯ Compared with conventional sternotomy, mini-MVR in the "real world" demonstrated no differences in rates of major morbidity, but it was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer transfusions. Contrary to our hypothesis, mini-MVR can be performed with similar total hospital costs as conventional sternotomy. In summary, minimally invasive mitral surgical procedure in select patients can provide superior outcomes without increased cost.