Lancet
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.
Ondansetron, a selective serotonin-receptor antagonist, is an effective antiemetic for patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. However, no comparison has been made between a combination of a serotonin antagonist and dexamethasone, which also has antiemetic properties, with currently available antiemetic regimens. 289 consecutive cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy (much greater than 50 mg/m2) were randomised to receive one of the following intravenous antiemetic regimens: ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, before and after cisplatin, + dexamethasone 20 mg before cisplatin (treatment A) or metoclopramide 3 mg/kg, before and after cisplatin, + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine 50 mg before cisplatin (treatment B). From day 2 to day 4, all patients received oral metoclopramide and intramuscular dexamethasone. 267 patients (136 receiving treatment A and 131 treatment (B) were available for analysis. ⋯ Patients receiving treatment B noted significantly more sedation than patients receiving treatment A (11.8% vs 2.1%; p less than 0.005). Extrapyramidal reactions were present only with treatment B (2.7%). Ondansetron + dexamethasone is more effective and better tolerated than metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and emesis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Double-blind study of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in intensive care.
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD), by means of non-absorbable antibiotics, to prevent infection in intensive-care units (ICUs) remains controversial; there is evidence that the regimen reduces the incidence of secondary infection, but no convincing reduction in morbidity or mortality has been shown and the costs and effect on microbial resistance patterns need further study. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have tried to find out whether SDD should be used routinely in all ICU patients at high risk of secondary infection. All patients admitted to the ICU who were thought likely to stay in the unit for at least 5 days and to need intubation for longer than 48 h were enrolled and randomly allocated to groups receiving placebo or SDD (amphotericin, colistin, and tobramycin applied to the oropharynx and enterally); all patients received intravenous cefotaxime for 72 h. ⋯ SDD substantially increased the costs of intensive care. Mechanisms other than bacterial colonisation of the gut may bring about substantial numbers of secondary infections in ICUs. Routine use of SDD in multidisciplinary ICUs cannot be recommended.
-
An association between aortic stenosis and haemorrhage from gastrointestinal angiodysplasia has been recognised for many years, but no explanation for this link has been found. Remarkably, aortic valve replacement, rather than bowel resection, corrects the bleeding. Aortic stenosis can be complicated by acquired von Willebrand's disease type IIA (vWD-IIA), which is corrected after valve replacement, and gastrointestinal angiodysplasia is a common site of bleeding in older patients with acquired or congenital vWD. Could the stenotic aortic valve lead to an acquired, reversible deficiency of the largest multimers of plasma von Willebrand factor (equivalent to vWD-IIA) and thus explain the association with gastrointestinal haemorrhage?