Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
-
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · Sep 2018
Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
During visual search, attention is believed to be controlled in a strictly feature-based fashion, without any guidance by object-based target representations. To challenge this received view, we measured electrophysiological markers of attentional selection (N2pc component) and working memory (sustained posterior contralateral negativity; SPCN) in search tasks where two possible targets were defined by feature conjunctions (e.g., blue circles and green squares). Critically, some search displays also contained nontargets with two target features (incorrect conjunction objects, e.g., blue squares). ⋯ This demonstrates that after an initial feature-based guidance phase, object-based templates are activated when they are required to distinguish target and nontarget objects. These templates modulate visual processing and control access to working memory, and their activation may coincide with the start of feature integration processes. Results also suggest that while multiple feature templates can be activated concurrently, only a single object-based target template can guide attention at any given time. (PsycINFO Database Record
-
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · Aug 2016
All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
To study whether top-down attentional control processes can be set simultaneously for different visual features, we employed a spatial cueing procedure to measure behavioral and electrophysiological markers of task-set contingent attentional capture during search for targets defined by 1 or 2 possible colors (one-color and two-color tasks). Search arrays were preceded by spatially nonpredictive color singleton cues. ⋯ When search displays contained 6 items in 6 different colors, so that participants had to adopt a fully feature-specific task set, the N2pc to distractor-color cues was eliminated in both tasks, indicating that nonmatching items were now successfully excluded from attentional processing. These results demonstrate that when observers adopt a feature-specific search mode, attentional task sets can be configured flexibly for multiple features within the same dimension, resulting in the rapid allocation of attention to task-set matching objects only. (PsycINFO Database Record
-
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · Jul 2018
Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Visual search for a target object occurs rapidly if there were no distractors to compete for attention, but this rarely happens in real-world environments. Distractors are almost always present and must be suppressed for target selection to succeed. Previous research suggests that one way this occurs is through the creation of a stimulus-specific distractor template. ⋯ We hypothesized that the pattern of distractor interference during testing would reveal the tuning of the suppression template: RTs should be commensurate with the degree to which distractor colors are encoded within the suppression template. Results from four experiments converged on the notion that the distractor template includes information about specific color values, but has broad "tuning," allowing suppression to generalize to new distractors. These results suggest that distractor templates, unlike target templates, encode multiple features and have broad representations, which have the advantage of generalizing suppression more easily to other potential distractors. (PsycINFO Database Record
-
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · Dec 2018
How feature relationships influence attention and awareness: Evidence from eye movements and EEG.
Many everyday tasks require selecting relevant objects in the visual field while ignoring irrelevant information. A widely held belief is that attention is tuned to the exact feature value(s) of a sought-after target object (e.g., color, shape). In contrast, subsequent studies have shown that attentional orienting (capture) is often determined by the relative feature(s) that the target has relative to other irrelevant items surrounding (e.g., redder, larger). ⋯ As expected, the results revealed that the initial capture of attention was strongest for distractors matching the relative color of the target, whereas similarity to the target was the most important determiner for dwelling. Awareness was more strongly determined by the initial capture of attention than dwelling. These results provide important insights into the interplay of attention and awareness and highlight the importance of considering relative, context-dependent features in theories of awareness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
-
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · Jan 2019
Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
Decades of research in attention have shown that salient distractors (e.g., a color singleton) tend to capture attention. However, in most studies, singleton distractors are just as likely to be present as absent. We therefore have little knowledge of how probabilistic expectations of the salient distractor's occurrence and features affect suppression. ⋯ The letter in the singleton location was reported less often in the high-frequency condition, suggesting proactive suppression of expected singleton. Additionally, we found that trial-to-trial repetitions of a singleton (irrespective of its color and location) facilitated performance (i.e., singleton repetition priming), but repetitions of its specific color or location did not. Together our findings demonstrate that attentional capture by a color singleton distractor is attenuated by probabilistic expectations of its occurrence, but not of its color and location. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).