Journal of neurosurgery
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Sep 2023
Conical drill bit for optimized external ventricular drain placement: a proof-of-concept study.
Despite external ventricular drain (EVD) procedures being commonplace in neurosurgical practice, suboptimal placement rates remain high, and complications are not uncommon. The angle of the EVD catheter insertion and the accuracy of the drill hole placement are major factors determining successful EVD placement that are dependent on the drill bit morphology. The standard cylindrical 2-fluted twist drill bit creates a relatively deep and narrow drill hole that requires precise positioning, has limited visibility of the drill hole bottom and restricted catheter angular adjustment range, and poses the risk of inadvertent dural puncture. To overcome the standard problems associated with EVD drill bit morphology, the authors propose novel cone-shaped drill bits for EVD placement. ⋯ The 30° conical drill bit can be safely used on its own or as a rescue tool to potentially achieve improved confidence, visualization, targeting, and precision of EVD placement while essentially eliminating the possibility of unintentional dural puncture with minimal increase in the total procedure time.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · May 2024
Stereotactic radiosurgery for noncavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas: treatment outcomes and their predictors.
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment modality for dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), particularly cavernous sinus (CS) dAVFs. However, the long-term outcomes of non-CS dAVFs are not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SRS for non-CS dAVFs and to investigate the risk factors for incomplete obliteration. ⋯ SRS for non-CS dAVFs is safe, and its efficacy is highly variable according to location. High-flow shunts may indicate greater radioresistance. In the retreated cases, new fistulas tended to be accompanied by sinus steno-occlusion and formed in the adjacent sinus segments.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Oct 2023
Artery of Uchimura: origin and evolution of identification of the vascular supply to the hippocampus.
In 1928, neuroscientist Yushi Uchimura (1897-1980) published a landmark study detailing the hippocampal vasculature. Working in Walther Spielmeyer's Munich laboratory (1925-1927), Uchimura sought evidence for a vascular theory of Ammon's horn sclerosis (AHS). He described an artery supplying the vulnerable sector of the hippocampus, where pathognomonic changes of AHS were noted, and characterized the artery as particularly susceptible to circulatory disturbances. ⋯ Uchimura's description of hippocampal vasculature, which is still subject to debate after nearly a century, brought international attention to AHS and epilepsy and showed the hippocampal vasculature to be variable and vulnerable; important considerations for later neurosurgeons in the development of selective mesial temporal surgery. Prominent figures in neurosurgery have since developed classification systems for the hippocampal vasculature in which the artery of Uchimura remains central. Perhaps no other brain artery has been the nexus for such intense investigation and debate about its association to structure, function, disease, and treatment methodology.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Apr 2024
The influence of prior percutaneous rhizotomy on outcomes following microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.
Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective intervention in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). How prior rhizotomy can impact long-term pain outcomes following MVD is not well understood. In this study, the authors sought to compare pain outcomes in patients who had undergone primary MVD versus those who had undergone secondary MVD after a single or multiple rhizotomies. ⋯ Percutaneous rhizotomy does not complicate outcomes following subsequent MVD for TN pain. However, patients undergoing rhizotomy before MVD may have an increased risk of postoperative facial numbness compared to that in patients undergoing primary MVD.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Apr 2024
Delayed nerve reconstruction for brachial plexus injuries: is the risk worth the reward?
Nerve reconstruction after 6 months of denervation time in brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) can be inconsistent. A dilemma exists when the use of critical donor nerves for nerve transfers may lead to unreliable outcomes that would waste the donor nerve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of elbow and shoulder function in patients with BPIs receiving nerve reconstruction in the delayed setting (i.e., 6-12 months after injury). ⋯ Nerve reconstruction can effectively restore functional elbow flexion and acceptable shoulder abduction in non-pan-plexus patients with BPI in the delayed setting. However, neither acceptable elbow flexion nor shoulder abduction could be consistently achieved in pan-plexus BPI. Judicious use of the donor nerves in pan-plexus injuries is required, in addition to preserving a donor nerve for a backup plan such as free-functioning muscle transplantation or tendon transfers.