Journal of neurosurgery
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jun 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialChemonucleolysis versus discectomy: a randomized multicenter trial.
A randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the results of open discectomy with those of chemonucleolysis in 151 patients suffering from a disc herniation at L4-5 or L5-S1. All patients fulfilled strict entry criteria; 78 patients underwent open discectomy and 73 were subjected to chemonucleolysis. An increase in radicular pain immediately after treatment was encountered in 16 patients (22%) in the chemonucleolysis group, as compared to none in the discectomy group. ⋯ Comparison of the final results of the two modes of treatment 12 months after the last intervention (including second treatment) did not reveal any significant differences. The duration of the preoperative symptoms, the level of disc herniation, and the leakage of contrast medium out of the disc appeared to be of no relevance to the final outcome. The complication rates in both treatment groups were low.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTiming of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study.
A total of 216 patients with a ruptured aneurysm of the anterior part of the circle of Willis were enrolled into this prospective randomized study of timing of the operation after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Only patients in clinical Grades I to III (according to the classification of Hunt and Hess) who were admitted and randomly assigned to a treatment group within 72 hours after the SAH were included in the trial. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three operation groups: acute surgery (AS: 0 to 3 days after the SAH; day of SAH = Day 0), intermediate surgery (IS: 4 to 7 days after the SAH), or late surgery (LS: 8 days to an indefinite time after the SAH). ⋯ When the nimodipine group and the no-nimodipine group (the 80 placebo-treated patients plus the 52 patients who were not entered into the nimodipine trial) were analyzed separately, a significant difference was seen in the outcome of the no-nimodipine group (dependent AS vs. dependent IS, p = 0.01). Nimodipine treatment was associated with a significant reduction of delayed ischemic deterioration (all operation group combined, nimodipine vs. no nimodipine p = 0.01; LS with nimodipine vs. LS with no nimodipine, p = 0.03).
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Nov 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of nutritional support on outcome from severe head injury.
Fifty-one brain-injured patients with peak 24-hour admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 4 to 10 were prospectively randomly assigned to receive total parenteral (TPN) or enteral (EN) nutrition. Patients were studied from hospital admission to 18 days postinjury. Outcome was assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postinjury. ⋯ In conclusion, more calories and protein usually can be administered to acute brain injury patients via the TPN route than by EN feedings via nasogastric or nasoduodenal routes. Traditional parameters for nutritional assessment are not useful in studying the efficacy of nutritional support during the first 2 weeks after head injury. Neurological recovery from head injury occurs more rapidly in patients with better early nutritional support.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Dec 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialComparison of mannitol regimens in patients with severe head injury undergoing intracranial monitoring.
Eighty patients sustaining head injuries and presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less were entered into a prospective randomized study to assess the benefit of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring with two regimens of mannitol administration. Group I was treated with mannitol for ICP elevations greater than 25 mm Hg, while Group II received empirical mannitol therapy irrespective of ICP readings. ⋯ These results are comparable to those of several published series of head-injured patients receiving similar treatment from 1977 to 1982. However, those series must be reassessed in light of recently published studies with treatment initiated at lower levels of ICP.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jul 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPercutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia. A prospective study of 100 cases.
A prospective study of percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (PRGR) with and without metrizamide trigeminal cisternography is reported in the treatment of the trigeminal neuralgia. A series of 100 patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia were allocated randomly to two treatment groups: Group I patients received PRGR with trigeminal cisternography (50 cases) and Group II patients received PRGR without trigeminal cisternography (50 cases). The results indicate that PRGR without trigeminal cisternography is a valid alternative to the original technique. Factors that assured the accurate performance of the modified technique proposed in this study were: spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid drainage; radiologically confirmed placement of the thin spinal needle at the clival edge into the trigeminal impression of the petrous apex and in the center of the foramen ovale; a positive response to the glycerol test; clinical control of the final glycerol injection; and an alert and cooperating patient throughout the entire procedure.