Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
The efficacy of a glial inhibitor, minocycline, for preventing persistent pain after lumbar discectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Minocycline strongly inhibits microglial activation, which contributes to central sensitization, a major mechanism underlying chronic pain development. We hypothesized that the perioperative administration of minocycline might decrease persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. We randomly assigned 100 patients undergoing scheduled lumbar discectomy to placebo and minocycline groups. ⋯ The incidence and intensity of neuropathic pain and functional scores did not differ between the minocycline and placebo groups. Exploratory analysis suggested that minocycline might be effective in a subgroup of patients with predominantly deep spontaneous pain at baseline. Perioperative minocycline administration for 8 days does not improve persistent pain after lumbar discectomy.
-
Pain and other sensory signs in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) are still poorly understood, as most investigations focus on motor system dysfunctions. This study aimed to investigate somatosensory changes in patients with primary RLS and the restoration of somatosensory function by guideline-based treatment. Forty previously untreated RLS patients were investigated unilaterally over hand and foot using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and were compared with 40 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. ⋯ QST suggested a type of spinal or supraspinal central sensitization differing from neuropathic pain or human experimental models of central sensitization by the absence of dynamic mechanical allodynia. Reversal of pinprick hyperalgesia by l-DOPA may be explained by impaired descending inhibitory dopaminergic control on spinal nociceptive neurons. Restoration of tactile sensitivity and paradoxical heat sensations suggest that they were functional disturbances resulting from central disinhibition.
-
This study investigated whether one becomes more quickly aware of innocuous somatosensory signals at locations of the body where pain is anticipated. Undergraduate students (N=20) indicated which of 2 stimuli that were administered to each hand using a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), was presented first. Participants were instructed that the color of a cue (1 of 2 colors) signaled the possible occurrence of pain on 1 hand (threat trials). ⋯ Results showed that during threat trials tactile stimuli on the hand where pain was expected, were perceived earlier in time than stimuli on the "neutral" hand. These findings demonstrate that the anticipation of pain at a particular location of the body resulted in the prioritization in time of somatosensory sensations at that location, indicating biased attention towards the threatened body part. The value of this study for investigating hypervigilance for somatosensory signals in clinical populations such as patients with chronic lower back pain is discussed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Oxycodone alters temporal summation but not conditioned pain modulation: preclinical findings and possible relations to mechanisms of opioid analgesia.
Opioid analgesia is mediated primarily by modulating (inhibiting and enhancing) pain mechanisms at the spinal and supraspinal levels. Advanced psychophysical paradigms of temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) likely represent pain mechanisms at both levels. Therefore, the study of opioid effects on TS and CPM can shed light on their analgesic mechanisms in humans. ⋯ In contrast, no significant effects of either oxycodone (F=0.871, P=.458) or placebo (F=2.086, P=.106) on the magnitude of CPM were found. These results suggest that under the current experimental conditions, oxycodone exerted spinal, rather than supraspinal, analgesic effects. Furthermore, compared with CPM, TS seems more suitable for studying the mechanisms of opioid analgesia in humans.
-
An accurate means of identifying patients at high risk for chronic disabling pain could lead to more cost-effective care, with more intensive interventions targeted to those likely to benefit most. The Chronic Pain Risk Score is a tool developed to predict risk for chronic pain. The aim of this study was to examine whether its predictive ability could be enhanced by: (1) improved measures of the constructs it assesses (Improved Chronic Pain Risk Model); and (2) adding other predictors (Expanded Chronic Pain Risk Model). ⋯ The Expanded Model improved significantly on the prediction of the Improved Model (NRI=0.56, P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC=0.84, 95% CI=0.79-0.88). The Improved Model (AUC=0.79, 95% CI=0.75-0.84) and the Chronic Pain Risk Score (AUC=0.76, 95% CI=0.71-0.81) showed acceptable discriminative ability. A limited set of measures may be used to predict risk for future clinically significant pain in patients initiating primary care for back pain, but further evaluation of prognostic models is needed.