Pain
-
Comparative Study
Phantom limb pain after amputation in diabetic patients does not differ from that after amputation in nondiabetic patients.
There is a commonly held belief that diabetic amputees experience less phantom limb pain than nondiabetic amputees because of the effects of diabetic peripheral neuropathy; however, evidence to verify this claim is scarce. In this study, a customised postal questionnaire was used to examine the effects of diabetes on the prevalence, characteristics, and intensity of phantom limb pain (PLP) and phantom sensations (PS) in a representative group of lower-limb amputees. Participants were divided into those who had self-reported diabetes (DM group) and those who did not (ND group). ⋯ Using a 0-10 visual analogue scale, the average intensity of PLP was 3.89 (±0.40) for the DM group and 4.38 (±0.41) for the ND group, which was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.402). Length of time since diagnosis of diabetes showed no correlation with average PLP intensity. Our findings suggest that there is no large difference in the prevalence, characteristics, or intensity of PLP when comparing diabetic and nondiabetic amputees, though a larger adjusted comparison would be valuable.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) antagonist in posttraumatic neuralgia.
We evaluated the analgesic efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) antagonist, AZD2423, in posttraumatic neuralgia. This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre study. One hundred thirty-three patients with posttraumatic neuralgia were equally randomized to 28days' oral administration of 20mg AZD2423, 150mg AZD2423 or placebo. ⋯ The CCR2 antagonist AZD2423 demonstrated no efficacy on NRS average pain scores and most of the secondary pain variables. The NPSI data suggested possible effects on certain sensory components of pain. There were no major safety or tolerability concerns.
-
Best current estimates of neuropathic pain prevalence come from studies using screening tools detecting pain with probable neuropathic features; the proportion experiencing significant, long-term neuropathic pain, and the proportion not responding to standard treatment are unknown. These "refractory" cases are the most clinically important to detect, being the most severe, requiring specialist treatment. The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of neuropathic pain in the population that is "refractory," and to quantify associated clinical and demographic features. ⋯ Graded categories of chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics were generated, incorporating the refractory criteria. Completed questionnaires were returned by 4451 individuals (response rate 47%); 399 had "chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics" (S-LANSS positive, 8.9% of the study sample); 215 (53.9%) also reported a positive relevant history ("Possible neuropathic pain"); and 98 (4.5% of all Chronic Pain) also reported an "adequate" trial of at least one neuropathic pain drug ("Treated possible neuropathic pain"). The most refractory cases were associated with dramatically poorer physical and mental health, lower pain self-efficacy, higher pain intensity and pain-related disability, and greater health care service use.
-
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a pivotal role in inflammatory processes, and individual TLRs have been investigated in nociception. We examined overlapping and diverging roles of spinal TLRs and their associated adaptor proteins in nociceptive processing. Intrathecal (IT) TLR2, TLR3, or TLR4 ligands (-L) evoked persistent (7-day) tactile allodynia (TA) that was abolished in respective TLR-deficient mice. ⋯ Hence, spinal TIR domain-containing adaptor protein (TIRAP) and TRIF cascades differentially lead to robust TA by TNF-dependent and independent pathways, whereas activation of TRIF modulated processing through type I IFN receptors. Based on these results, we believe that processes leading to the activation of these spinal TLRs initiate TNF-dependent and -independent cascades, which contribute to the associated persistent pain state. In addition, TRIF pathways are able to modulate the TNF-dependent pain state through IFNβ.