Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Management of acute whiplash: A randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary stratified treatments.
Acute whiplash is a heterogeneous disorder that becomes persistent in 40% to 60% of cases. Estimates of recovery have not changed in recent decades. This randomized, single-blind, controlled trial tested whether multidisciplinary individualized treatments for patients with acute whiplash (<4 weeks postinjury) could reduce the incidence of chronicity at 6 mo by 50% compared to usual care. ⋯ Analysis revealed no significant differences in frequency of recovery (NDI ≤ 8%) between pragmatic and usual care groups at 6 months (OR 95%, CI=0.55, 0.23-1.29), P=0.163) or 12 mo (OR 95%, CI=0.65, 0.28-1.47, P=0.297). There was no improvement in current nonrecovery rates at 6 mo (63.6%, pragmatic care; 48.8%, usual care), indicating no advantage of the early multiprofessional intervention. Baseline levels of pain and disability had a significant bearing on recovery both at 6 and 12 mo in both groups, suggesting that future research focus on finding early effective pain management, particularly for the subgroup of patients with initial high levels of pain and disability, towards improving recovery rates.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Nocebo hyperalgesia induced by social observational learning.
Nocebo effects can be acquired by verbal suggestion, but it is unknown whether they can be induced through observational learning and whether they are influenced by factors known to influence pain perception, such as pain anxiety or pain catastrophizing. Eighty-five female students (aged 22.5 ± 4.4 years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Participants in the control condition (CC) received information that an ointment had no effect on pain perception. ⋯ The nocebo response correlated with pain catastrophizing but not with pain anxiety or somatosensory amplification. A nocebo response to pressure pain was induced by observational learning but not by verbal suggestion. This finding highlights the importance of investigating the influence of observational learning on nocebo hyperalgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
The efficacy of a glial inhibitor, minocycline, for preventing persistent pain after lumbar discectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Minocycline strongly inhibits microglial activation, which contributes to central sensitization, a major mechanism underlying chronic pain development. We hypothesized that the perioperative administration of minocycline might decrease persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. We randomly assigned 100 patients undergoing scheduled lumbar discectomy to placebo and minocycline groups. ⋯ The incidence and intensity of neuropathic pain and functional scores did not differ between the minocycline and placebo groups. Exploratory analysis suggested that minocycline might be effective in a subgroup of patients with predominantly deep spontaneous pain at baseline. Perioperative minocycline administration for 8 days does not improve persistent pain after lumbar discectomy.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Oxycodone alters temporal summation but not conditioned pain modulation: preclinical findings and possible relations to mechanisms of opioid analgesia.
Opioid analgesia is mediated primarily by modulating (inhibiting and enhancing) pain mechanisms at the spinal and supraspinal levels. Advanced psychophysical paradigms of temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) likely represent pain mechanisms at both levels. Therefore, the study of opioid effects on TS and CPM can shed light on their analgesic mechanisms in humans. ⋯ In contrast, no significant effects of either oxycodone (F=0.871, P=.458) or placebo (F=2.086, P=.106) on the magnitude of CPM were found. These results suggest that under the current experimental conditions, oxycodone exerted spinal, rather than supraspinal, analgesic effects. Furthermore, compared with CPM, TS seems more suitable for studying the mechanisms of opioid analgesia in humans.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial.
There is little evidence for multisession repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain (NP), although single-session rTMS was suggested to provide transient pain relief in NP patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 10 daily rTMS in NP patients. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study at 7 centers. ⋯ There were no significant cumulative improvements in VAS, SF-MPQ, and BDI. No serious adverse events were observed. Our findings demonstrate that daily high-frequency rTMS of M1 is tolerable and transiently provides modest pain relief in NP patients.