Pain
-
The subjective experience of pain is influenced by interactions between experiences, future predictions, and incoming afferent information. Expectations of high pain can exacerbate pain, whereas expectations of low pain during a consistently noxious stimulus can produce significant reductions in pain. However, the brain mechanisms associated with processing mismatches between expected and experienced pain are poorly understood, but are important for imparting salience to a sensory event to override erroneous top-down expectancy-mediated information. ⋯ Thus, violated expectations of pain engage mechanisms supporting salience-driven sensory discrimination, working memory, and associative learning processes. By overriding the influence of expectations on pain, these brain mechanisms are likely engaged in clinical situations in which patients' unrealistic expectations of pain relief diminish the efficacy of pain treatments. Accordingly, these findings underscore the importance of maintaining realistic expectations to augment the effectiveness of pain management.
-
A large number of analgesics have failed to prove superiority over placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and as this has been related to increasing placebo responses, there is currently an interest in specifying predictors of the placebo response. The literature on placebo mechanisms suggests that factors related to patients' expectations of treatment efficacy are pivotal for the placebo response. Also, general characteristics of RCTs have been suggested to influence the placebo response. ⋯ Opioid trials, a high number of planned face-to-face visits, and randomization ratio predicted the magnitude of the placebo response, thereby supporting the expectancy hypothesis. Exploratory models with baseline pain intensity, age, washout length, and discontinuation because of adverse events accounted for approximately 10% of the variability in the placebo response. Based on these results and previous mechanisms studies, we think that patients' perception of treatment allocation and expectations toward treatment efficacy could potently predict outcomes of RCTs.
-
Review
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the Brain: Guidelines for Pain Treatment Research.
Recognizing that electrically stimulating the motor cortex could relieve chronic pain sparked development of noninvasive technologies. In transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electromagnetic coils held against the scalp influence underlying cortical firing. Multiday repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce long-lasting, potentially therapeutic brain plasticity. ⋯ Minimum required elements include sample sources, sizes, and demographics, recruitment methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline and posttreatment means and SD, adverse effects, safety concerns, discontinuations, and medication-usage records. Outcomes should be monitored for at least 3 months after initiation with prespecified statistical analyses. Multigroup collaborations or registry studies may be needed for pivotal trials.