Pain
-
Oxaliplatin is a cornerstone chemotherapeutic used in the treatment of colorectal cancer, the third leading cause of death in Western countries. Most side effects of this platinum-containing drug are adequately managed in the clinic, although acute and long-term neurotoxicity still severely compromises the quality of life of patients treated with oxaliplatin. ⋯ Furthermore, we show that FDA-approved drugs that inhibit carbonic anhydrase (an enzyme that is linked to haemoglobin in intracellular pH homeostasis), ie, topiramate and acetazolamide, revert (1) oxaliplatin-induced cytosolic acidification and TRPA1 and TRPV1 modulation in DRG neurons in culture, (2) oxaliplatin-induced cytosolic acidification of DRG of treated animals, and (3) oxaliplatin-induced acute cold allodynia in mice while not affecting OHP-induced cytotoxicity on cancer cells. Our data would therefore suggest that reversal of oxaliplatin-induced cytosolic acidification is a viable strategy to minimize acute oxaliplatin-induced symptoms.
-
Meta Analysis
Intraoperative methadone administration and postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Postoperative pain is not adequately managed in greater than 40% of surgical patients and is a high priority for perioperative research. In this meta-analysis, we examined studies comparing postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in surgical patients who received methadone by any route vs those who received another opioid by any route. Studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus from January 1966 to November 2018. ⋯ The results demonstrate that surgical patients who received intraoperative methadone had lower postoperative opioid consumption, generally reported lower pain scores and experienced better satisfaction with analgesia. However, these advantages need to be weighed carefully against dangerous risks with perioperative methadone, specifically respiratory depression and arrhythmia. Future studies should explore logistics, safety, and cost effectiveness.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
A randomized controlled trial of five daily sessions and continuous trial of four weekly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain.
We conducted a multicenter, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) in patients with neuropathic pain (NP). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 daily sessions of active or sham rTMS of M1 corresponding to the part of the body experiencing the worst pain (500 pulses per session at 5 Hz). Responders were invited to enroll in an open-label continuous trial involving 4 weekly sessions of active rTMS. ⋯ No serious adverse events were observed. Five daily sessions of rTMS with stimulus conditions used in this trial were ineffective in short-term pain relief in the whole study population with various NP. Long-term administration to the responders should be investigated for the clinical use of rTMS on NP in the future trials.
-
Native Americans (NAs) have a higher prevalence of chronic pain than other U. S. racial/ethnic groups, but there have been few attempts to understand the mechanisms of this pain disparity. This study used a comprehensive battery of laboratory tasks to assess peripheral fiber function (cool/warm detection thresholds), pain sensitivity (eg, thresholds/tolerances), central sensitization (eg, temporal summation), and pain inhibition (conditioned pain modulation) in healthy, pain-free adults (N = 155 NAs, N = 150 non-Hispanic Whites [NHWs]). ⋯ There were no group differences on any measure, except that NAs had lower cold-pressor pain thresholds and tolerances, indicating greater pain sensitivity than NHWs. These findings suggest that there are no group differences between healthy NAs and NHWs on peripheral fiber function, central sensitization, or central pain inhibition, but NAs may have greater sensitivity to cold pain. Future studies are needed to examine potential within-group factors that might contribute to NA pain risk.
-
There has been an explosion of interest in the utility of cannabinoids as potential analgesics. This systematic review critically synthesizes the evidence for cannabinoid analgesic effects on quantitative sensory testing outcomes in both healthy adults and patients with chronic noncancer pain. Our systematic review protocol is preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42018117367). ⋯ Patterns of findings from studies with healthy subjects did not substantively differ from those with chronic noncancer pain. However, these observations are qualified by the high degree of inconsistency across studies and methodological heterogeneity. We offer recommendations for future studies to improve study rigor and reproducibility.