Pain
-
Migraine headache is one of the most common neurological disorders. The pathological conditions that directly initiate afferent pain signaling are poorly understood. In trigeminal neurons retrogradely labeled from the cranial meninges, we have recorded pH-evoked currents using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. ⋯ The desensitization time constant of pH 6.0-evoked currents in the majority of dural afferents was less than 500ms which is consistent with that reported for ASIC3 homomeric or heteromeric channels. Finally, application of pH 5.0 synthetic-interstitial fluid to the dura produced significant decreases in facial and hind-paw withdrawal threshold, an effect blocked by amiloride but not TRPV1 antagonists, suggesting that ASIC activation produces migraine-related behavior in vivo. These data provide a cellular mechanism by which decreased pH in the meninges following ischemic or inflammatory events directly excites afferent pain-sensing neurons potentially contributing to migraine headache.
-
Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of diabetes and causes various problems in daily life. Several investigations have noted that many factors in the spinal cord are involved in the symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy, and there are very few effective therapeutic regimens. In the present study, we sought to elucidate the role of the RhoA/Rho kinase (ROCK) pathway in thermal hyperalgesia in diabetic mice. ⋯ The expression of eNOS and NO metabolite contents in the spinal cord was decreased in diabetic mice, and these changes were normalized by treatment with simvastatin. The present results show that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have an inhibitory effect on thermal hyperalgesia in diabetic mice, which is mediated by an increase in NO production through the inhibition of RhoA/ROCK pathways. These results suggest that ROCK inhibitors and HMG-CoA inhibitors may be attractive compounds to relieve the symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathies.
-
Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) are useful for presenting treatment response, conveying the clinical relevance of results. NNTs are typically calculated at a landmark endpoint (end of trial), but often using the last observation carried forward (LOCF), which ignores patient discontinuations. We compared NNTs in chronic low back pain (CLBP) using three separate imputation methods, using data from two identical 12-week trials comparing etoricoxib 60 mg (N=210), 90 mg (N=212), and placebo (N=217). ⋯ Landmark NNTs at week 12 were generally similar or slightly lower (better) than those from a longitudinal approach, but results were inconsistent. Landmark analyses provide no information on response variability, as is obtained with longitudinal analysis. Outcome, imputation method, and reporting method are intimately connected and need to be considered alongside trial quality and validity to make sensible comparisons between treatments.