Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain.
Although cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) have been demonstrated to be effective for a variety of chronic pain problems, patients vary in their response and little is known about patient characteristics that predict or moderate treatment effects. Furthermore, although cognitive-behavioral theory posits that changes in patient beliefs and coping mediate the effects of CBT on patient outcomes, little research has systematically tested this. Therefore, we examined mediators, moderators, and predictors of treatment effects in a randomized controlled trial of CBT for chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain. ⋯ Patients who reported more pain sites, depressive symptoms, non-specific physical problems, rumination, catastrophizing, and stress before treatment had higher activity interference at one year. The effects of CBT generally did not vary according to patient baseline characteristics, suggesting that all patients potentially may be helped by this therapy. The results provide further support for cognitive-behavioral models of chronic pain and point to the potential benefits of interventions to modify specific pain-related beliefs in CBT and in other health care encounters.
-
Multicenter Study
Pain-related catastrophizing and perceived social responses: Inter-relationships in the context of chronic pain.
Pain-related coping, particularly catastrophizing, plays a significant role in shaping pain responses. One way catastrophizing is hypothesized to amplify pain and disability is via its effect on patients' social environments (e.g., communal coping model), though empirical support is limited. The present study tested whether the association between catastrophizing and deleterious pain-related outcomes was mediated by patients' perceptions of significant others' responses to their pain in a sample of 1356 pain patients. ⋯ In sum, perceived social responses were found to play a small role in mediating the relationship between catastrophizing and pain-related outcomes, and these mediational effects may be strongest in particular patient subgroups. The present data suggest that interpersonal mechanisms may not constitute a primary route by which catastrophizing exerts its maladaptive effects on pain responses. The study and further understanding of what principal factors mediate catastrophizing's deleterious effects on pain will be important in illuminating the biopsychosocial model of pain.
-
Controlled Clinical Trial
Higher levels of pain readiness to change and more positive affect reduce pain reports--a weekly assessment study on arthritis patients.
The objective of the study was to analyze the relationships between Pain Readiness to Change, weekly measures of positive and negative affect and pain over eight subsequent weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Factor analysis based on data from three different samples of patients with rheumatic diseases and other chronic pain conditions suggested a three factor solution for the Norwegian version of the Pain Stages of Change questionnaire (PSOCQ) representing Precontemplation, Contemplation, and Action/Maintenance (ACT) stages from the original Transtheoretical Model. ⋯ This may imply that a combination of cognitive factors and positive affect is most effective in relation to pain reduction. Results encourage continued investigation of apparent interactions between chronic pain, affect, and pain self-management.
-
There is evidence that patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) have altered central sensorimotor processing. Sensory input can influence motor output either through indirect pathways or through direct connections from the sensory to motor cortex. The purpose of this study was to investigate sensorimotor interaction via direct connections in patients with CRPS and to compare the results with normal subjects'. ⋯ In seven of the eight CRPS patients EMG responses to TMS were suppressed when paired with median nerve stimulation. Only one CRPS patient's results showed no suppression of EMG responses. These results suggest that the disease mechanisms of CRPS1 do not typically affect the direct neural circuit between sensory and motor cortex and that normal sensorimotor interaction is occurring via this route.