Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Naloxone provokes similar pain facilitation as observed after short-term infusion of remifentanil in humans.
In contrast to an expected preventive analgesic effect, clinical observations suggest that intraoperatively applied opioids can induce postoperative hyperalgesia. We tested the development of post-infusion hyperalgesia in a newly developed experimental model of electrically induced pain and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. In a double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study, 13 subjects received either saline placebo, remifentanil (0.05 or 0.1 microg/kg/min) or naloxone (0.01 mg/kg). ⋯ Naloxone infusion similarly resulted in increased pain (anti-analgesia) (p<0.001) and mechanical hyperalgesia (p<0.01). Increased pain ratings following withdrawal of remifentanil significantly correlated to anti-analgesia evoked by the mu-opioid antagonist naloxone (p<0.01) and was of similar magnitude, suggesting inhibition of endogenous opioids as an underlying mechanism. In contrast, hyperalgesia after remifentanil was more pronounced than hyperalgesia after naloxone administration and did not correlate to the observed anti-analgesic effects, suggesting the involvement of additional receptors systems other than the endorphin system.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The effect of opioid analgesia on exercise test performance in chronic low back pain.
The effect of opioid analgesia on tests of muscular function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is unknown. Twenty-eight subjects with CLBP of at least moderate intensity performed the Sorensen isokinetic exercise test once after receiving 1 microg/kg fentanyl intravenously and once after placebo in a randomized-order double-blind crossover design. Naloxone 3 microg/kg was administered after the fentanyl phase. ⋯ We presume that the pain relief resulted in increased test performance. Our result is at odds with those of randomized trials which have failed to demonstrate increased function following the treatment of pain with opioid analgesics. This highlights the complexity of the interaction between pain, analgesia and changes in function.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Controlled-release oxycodone relieves neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial in painful diabetic neuropathy.
Painful neuropathy is one of the most common long-term complications of diabetes mellitus and often proves difficult to relieve. ⋯ CR oxycodone is effective and safe for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy and improves QOL.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intrathecal, but not intravenous adenosine reduces allodynia in patients with neuropathic pain.
Intrathecal adenosine reduces allodynia from intradermal capsaicin in human volunteers, and reduces hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli in animals with nerve injury. Although both intrathecal and intravenous adenosine have been reported to relieve pain in patients with neuropathic pain, there are no controlled trials of this therapy. In order to determine the effect of adenosine, seven patients with chronic neuropathic pain and stable areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were recruited. ⋯ Intrathecal, but not intravenous adenosine, caused backache in five of seven patients, lasting 6 h. These results indicate that intrathecal adenosine reduces allodynia and pain from stimulation in the area of allodynia, whereas the same dose of adenosine intravenously was ineffective. Given the modest effect and common side effects, the role for intrathecal adenosine as a sole agent for the treatment of neuropathic pain may be limited.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients. An empirical investigation.
In order to investigate external factors that may influence the magnitude of placebo analgesia as well as psychological factors that mediate placebo analgesia, 13 irritable bowl syndrome (IBS) patients rated evoked rectal distension and cutaneous heat pain under the conditions of natural history (NH), rectal placebo (RP), rectal nocebo (RN), rectal lidocaine (RL) and oral lidocaine (OL). Patients were given verbal suggestions for pain relief and rated expected pain levels and desire for pain relief for both evoked visceral and cutaneous pain, respectively. Large reductions in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings were found in the RP, RL and OL condition as compared to the natural history condition, whereas no significant difference in pain reduction between the three treatment conditions was found. ⋯ Since IBS patients rate these stimuli as much higher than do normal control subjects and since placebo effects were very large, they probably reflect anti-hyperalgesic mechanisms to a major extent. Expected pain levels and desire for pain relief accounted for large amounts of the variance in visceral pain intensity in the RP, RL, and OL condition (up to 81%), and for lower amounts of the variance in cutaneous pain intensity. Hence, the combination of expected pain levels and desire for pain relief may offer an alternative means of assessing the contribution of placebo factors during analgesia.