Pain
-
A number of ergonomic, workplace and individual psychosocial factors and health behaviors have been associated with the onset, exacerbation and/or maintenance of low back pain (LBP). The functional impact of these factors may be influenced by how a worker approaches problems in general. The present study was conducted to determine whether problem-solving orientation was associated with physical and mental health outcomes in fully employed workers (soldiers) reporting a history of LBP in the past year. ⋯ Among those with a longer history of low-grade LBP, an avoidant approach to problem-solving was also associated with a steeper gradient of functional loss (three-way interaction; F(1,458)=4.58). These results suggest that the prolonged impact of LBP on daily function may be reduced by assisting affected workers to conceptualize LBP as a problem that can be overcome and using strategies that promote taking an active role in reducing risks for LBP. Secondary prevention efforts may be improved by addressing these factors.
-
We examined the effects of amlodipine, a selective L-type voltage dependent Ca(2+) channel (VDCC) blocker, and mibefradil, a selective T-type VDCC blocker on the antinociceptive effects of morphine, and mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor selective agonist-induced antinociception at the spinal level. Intrathecally administered amlodipine and mibefradil potentiated morphine and [D-Ala(2), N mePhe(4), Gly-ol(5)] enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced antinociception by shifting their dose response curves to the left. ⋯ These data indicate that L-type and T-type VDCC blockers synergistically potentiate the analgesic effects of mu opioid receptor agonists, but not delta and kappa opioid receptor agonists, at the spinal level. Additionally, these data suggest that there is an important functional interaction between L-type and/ or T-type VDCC and mu opioid receptors in the process of analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic profile of peroral and topical ketoprofen upon low pH-induced muscle pain.
Topical analgesics are widely marketed for treatment of muscle and joint pain. We have recently developed a model of muscle pain and have used this model to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available topical and peroral ketoprofen in order to evaluate the time- and dose-dependence of analgesia. In the present study, we examined the dose- (0, 50, and 100 mg) and time-dependence (hourly to 8 h) of commercially available peroral and topical ketoprofen. ⋯ The apparent analgesia was rapid to develop but transient and pain ratings increased back to baseline values within 3 h for the 100 mg dose and within 2 h for the 50 mg dose. This data suggests that topical application of commercial gel-based systems does not provide long-lasting analgesia in the muscle when compared to perorally-dosed ketoprofen. In addition, the data show that even doses of 100 mg peroral ketoprofen do not provide complete relief of muscle pain.
-
The present study (1) examined analgesic effects of systemically and spinally administered antidepressants (ADs) on phase 2 flinching and biting/licking behaviours in the rat formalin test, a model considered to be of greater relevance to clinical pain than acute threshold tests, and (2) determined whether motor or anti-inflammatory effects contributed to such actions. Systemic administration of amitriptyline (3-20 mg/kg) produced a dose-related enhancement of flinching behaviours, while at the same time suppressing biting/licking behaviours. Imipramine (except for 20 mg/kg), nortriptyline, desipramine and fluoxetine had no significant effect on flinching behaviours, while producing a dose-related suppression of biting/licking behaviours. ⋯ Spinal administration of nortriptyline by lumbar puncture also reduced paw volume, but for other agents, the reduction was not significant. Motor effects were noted qualitatively throughout these experiments, and considered in relation to nociceptive behaviours. These results indicate (a) a marked dissociation between the effects of systemic ADs on flinching and biting/licking behaviours in the formalin test, (b) spinal efficacy of ADs that essentially reproduces effects seen with systemic administration when given by lumbar puncture, (c) a lack of causality between anti-inflammatory effects of ADs and their analgesic properties in the formalin test, and (d) a contribution of motor effects to analgesic actions at higher doses affecting biting/licking but not flinching behaviours.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance.
Response expectancies have been proposed as the major determinant of placebo effects. Here we report that different expectations produce different analgesic effects which in turn can be harnessed in clinical practice. Thoracotomized patients were treated with buprenorphine on request for 3 consecutive days, together with a basal intravenous infusion of saline solution. ⋯ Overall, after 3 days of placebo infusion, the first group received 11.55 mg of buprenorphine, the second group 9.15 mg, and the third group 7.65 mg. Despite these dose differences, analgesia was the same in the three groups. These results indicate that different verbal instructions about certain and uncertain expectations of analgesia produce different placebo analgesic effects, which in turn trigger a dramatic change of behaviour leading to a significant reduction of opioid intake.