Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Pain-related beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping have been shown to be associated with measures of physical and psychosocial functioning among patients with chronic musculoskeletal and rheumatologic pain. However, little is known about the relative importance of these process variables in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). To address this gap in the literature, self-report measures of pain, beliefs, catastrophizing, coping, pain-related activity interference, jaw activity limitations, and depression, as well as an objective measure of jaw opening impairment, were obtained from 118 patients at a TMD specialty clinic. ⋯ Controlling for age, gender, pain intensity, and the other process variables, significant associations were found between (1) beliefs and activity interference and depression, and (2) catastrophizing and depression. No process variable was associated significantly with the objective measure of jaw impairment. The results suggest that for patients with moderate or high levels of TMD pain and dysfunction, beliefs about pain play an important role in physical and psychosocial functioning.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales.
The purpose of the study was to compare the psychometric properties of four established pain scales in a population of hospitalized older adults (mean age, 76 years) with varying levels of cognitive impairment. Patients made ratings of current pain three times/day for 7 days. They also made retrospective daily, weekly, and bi-weekly ratings of usual, worst, and least pain levels over a 14-day period. ⋯ Retrospective estimates of pain varied by mental status: a combination of usual/worst pain was best for cognitively impaired patients, while a combination of usual/least pain was best for unimpaired patients. These findings support the use of the 21-point box scale for pain assessment in older patients, including those with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. They also support the ability of older, cognitively impaired patients to rate pain reliably and validly.
-
This study describes the development and validation of a novel tool for identifying patients in whom neuropathic mechanisms dominate their pain experience. The Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) Pain Scale is based on analysis of sensory description and bedside examination of sensory dysfunction, and provides immediate information in clinical settings. It was developed in two populations of chronic pain patients. ⋯ This data was used to derive a seven item pain scale, consisting of grouped sensory description and sensory examination with a simple scoring system. The LANSS Pain Scale was validated in a second group of patients (n = 40) by assessing discriminant ability, internal consistency and agreement by independent raters. Clinical and research applications of the LANSS Pain Scale are discussed.
-
The traditional concept that pain is poorly localized has been challenged by recent studies, where subjects were able to point to the stimulated spot on the skin with an accuracy of 10-20 mm. Pointing movements themselves, however, have errors of about 15 mm. To determine the limits of sensory performance of the nociceptive system independent of motor performance, point localization of heat pain (540 mJ punctate laser stimuli, 5 mm diameter), mechanical pain (256 mN punctate probe, 200 microm diameter), and touch (16 mN von Frey probe, 1.1 mm diameter) were tested in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm in 12 healthy subjects. ⋯ Sequential spatial discrimination for touch was significantly better than simultaneous spatial discrimination tested with a grating orientation task (18.9 mm), but both were one order of magnitude worse than at the finger tip (1.3 mm, 0.4 +/- 0.1 log2 units). In conclusion, pain evoked by radiant heat pulses and touch evoked by von Frey probes were localized with similar precision on the back of the hand. These findings indicate that outside the tactile fovea at finger tips or lips the spatial discrimination capacities of the nociceptive and tactile systems are about equal.
-
A comparison was made of spontaneous nociceptive behaviors elicited by subcutaneous injection of formalin (0.5-10.0%) into the plantar or dorsal surface of the right hindpaw in rats. In the present study, we also examined the effect of paw formalin injection on the release of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (nitrite/nitrate) and glutamate from the spinal cord in anesthetized rats using a dialysis probe placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space. Two distinct quantifiable behaviors indicative of pain were identified by formalin injected into both regions of the paw. ⋯ A significant increase of glutamate was observed in the 0-10 min samples obtained after injection of formalin (5.0%) into the plantar and dorsal surface of the paw, whereas 0.5 and 10.0% formalin induced no substantial release. These results suggest that 5.0% formalin should be used when studying antinociceptive activity of NO- and N-methyl-D-aspartate-related compounds in the formalin test in rats. Formalin injection into the plantar surface of the paw might prove to be useful for evoking the licking/biting response, particularly in the early phase.