Pain
-
Review Meta Analysis
The burden of neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of health utilities.
Patients with neuropathic pain (NeuP) experience substantially lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than the general population. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to test the hypothesis that NeuP is associated with low levels of health utility. A structured search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CINAHL) was undertaken. ⋯ This study confirms the hypothesis that patients with NeuP experience low utilities and therefore low HRQoL. However, the contribution of non-NeuP co-morbidity remains unclear. Neuropathic pain severity emerged as a primary predictor of the negative health impact of NeuP.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies for management of chronic pain in children and adolescents: an updated meta-analytic review.
The purpose of this meta-analytic review was to quantify the effects of psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain in youth. Specifically, in this review we updated previous systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials by including new trials, and by adding disability and emotional functioning to pain as treatment outcomes. Electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, EMBASE, and the Social Sciences Citation Index were conducted from inception through August 2008. ⋯ Studies directly comparing the effects of self-administered versus therapist-administered interventions found similar effects on pain reduction. Psychological therapies result in improvement in pain relief across several different pain conditions in children. Future trials are needed that incorporate non-pain outcome domains, that focus significant therapeutic content on reductions in disability, and that include extended follow-up to better understand maintenance of treatment effects.
-
Review Meta Analysis
A systematic review of adverse events in placebo groups of anti-migraine clinical trials.
In analgesic clinical trials, adverse events are reported for the painkiller under evaluation and compared with adverse events in the placebo group. Interestingly, patients who receive the placebo often report a high frequency of adverse events, but little is understood about the nature of these negative effects. In the present study, we compared the rates of adverse events reported in the placebo arms of clinical trials for three classes of anti-migraine drugs: NSAIDs, triptans and anticonvulsants. ⋯ For example, anorexia and memory difficulties, which are typical adverse events of anticonvulsants, were present only in the placebo arm of these trials. These results suggest that the adverse events in placebo arms of clinical trials of anti-migraine medications depend on the adverse events of the active medication against which the placebo is compared. These findings are in accordance with the expectation theory of placebo and nocebo effects.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Meta-analysis of the relevance of the OPRM1 118A>G genetic variant for pain treatment.
Regard of functional pharmacogenetic polymorphisms may further the success of pain therapy by adopting individualized approaches. The mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) 118A>G polymorphism is a promising candidate for both opioid effects and pain because of both biological reasonability and apparent experimental and clinical evidence. We analyzed its importance for pain therapy using a meta-analytic approach to studies relating it to opioid pain therapy. ⋯ Only weak evidence of an association with less nausea (effect size, Cohen's d=-0.21, p=0.037) and of increased opioid dosage requirements (d=0.56, p=0.018) in homozygous carriers of the G allele was obtained. This indicates that despite initially promising results, available evidence of the clinical relevance of the OPRM1 118A>G polymorphism does not withhold a meta-analysis. This discourages basing personalized therapeutic concepts of pain therapy on OPRM1 118A>G genotyping at the present state of evidence.
-
Meta Analysis
Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
The efficacy of gabapentin (GPT) and pregabalin (PGB) in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was assessed. We screened MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, www.clinicaltrials.org, the Cochrane Library (through October 2008), and the reference sections of original studies on GPT/PGB in FMS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of FMS with GPT and PGB were analyzed. ⋯ There was strong evidence for a reduction of pain (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.36, -0.20; p<0.001), improved sleep (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.48, -0.39; p<0.001), and improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.46, -0.15; p<0.001), but not for depressed mood (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.30, 0.06; p=0.18). There was strong evidence for a non-substantial reduction of fatigue (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.23, -0.09, p<0.001) and of anxiety (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.27, -0.10; p<0.001). The external validity of the studies was limited because patients with severe somatic and mental disorders were excluded.