Pain
-
The results of a considerable number of recent prospective studies have demonstrated that greater acute pain severity in herpes zoster patients is associated with a significantly greater risk of developing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Only a few studies have examined the relationships between acute pain severity and demographic characteristics and clinical features of patients with herpes zoster, however, and the results of these studies have been inconsistent. ⋯ These results demonstrate that three of the established risk factors for PHN - older age, greater rash severity, and the presence of a prodrome - are also associated with more severe acute pain assessed soon after rash onset in patients with herpes zoster. The results of this study are consistent with the recommendation that herpes zoster patients who are older, who have had a prodrome, or who have severe rash or severe acute pain should be targeted for interventions designed to prevent PHN.
-
Meta Analysis
Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough?
We sought to investigate the potential of using a simple global estimation ('How effective do you think the treatment was?') as a measure of efficacy by comparing it with at least 50%maxTOTPAR (at least 50% of the maximum possible pain relief) in acute pain studies. One hundred and fifty randomized, double-blind trials included in 11 systematic reviews of single dose, oral analgesics for postoperative pain were used as a source of data. The relationship between the proportion of patients reporting the top two or three values on a five-point global scale and the proportion with at least 50%maxTOTPAR was investigated. ⋯ Individual patient data were also used from four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in postoperative pain. The frequency distribution for %maxTOTPAR was plotted for patients reporting each of the five categories on the global scale. A global assessment provides similar measures of analgesic efficacy as TOTPAR derived from hourly measurements, but the effects of adverse effects have yet to be understood.
-
Pain is the major complaint of the estimated one million U. S. consumers who use acupuncture each year. Although acupuncture is widely available in chronic pain clinics, the effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic pain remains in question. ⋯ Six or more acupuncture treatments were significantly associated with positive outcomes (P=0.03) even after adjusting for study quality. We conclude there is limited evidence that acupuncture is more effective than no treatment for chronic pain; and inconclusive evidence that acupuncture is more effective than placebo, sham acupuncture or standard care. However, we have found an important relationship between the methodology of the studies and their results that should guide future research.
-
Meta Analysis
Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain.
The objectives of the study were (1) to carry out a systematic review to assess the analgesic efficacy and the adverse effects of acupuncture compared with placebo for back and neck pain and (2) to develop a new tool, the Oxford Pain Validity Scale (OPVS), to measure validity of findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to enable ranking of trial findings according to validity within qualitative reviews. Published RCTs (of acupuncture at both traditional and non-traditional points) were identified from systematic searching of bibliographic databases (e.g. MEDLINE) and reference lists of retrieved reports. ⋯ OPVS is a useful tool for assessing the validity of trials in qualitative reviews. With acupuncture for chronic back and neck pain, we found that the most valid trials tended to be negative. There is no convincing evidence for the analgesic efficacy of acupuncture for back or neck pain.
-
A systematic review of the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose aspirin compared with placebo in postoperative pain. ⋯ There was a clear dose-response for pain relief with aspirin, even though these were single dose studies. Adverse effects, drowsiness and gastric irritation were also evident in the single dose studies. The pain relief achieved with aspirin was very similar milligram for milligram to that seen with paracetamol.