Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Gabapentin in neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled 8-week study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain, using doses up to 2400 mg/day. The study used a novel design that was symptom- rather than syndrome-based; an approach that aimed to reflect the realities of clinical practice. Participants had a wide range of neuropathic pain syndromes, with at least two of the following symptoms: allodynia, burning pain, shooting pain, or hyperalgesia. ⋯ Gabapentin was well tolerated and the majority of patients completed the study (79 versus 73% for placebo). The most common adverse events were mild to moderate dizziness and somnolence, most of which were transient and occurred during the titration phase. This study shows that gabapentin reduces pain and improves some quality-of-life measures in patients with a wide range of neuropathic pain syndromes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Intra-articular morphine as analgesic in temporomandibular joint arthralgia/osteoarthritis.
The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of a single dose intra-articular injection (i.a.) of morphine in 53 patients with unilateral arthralgia/osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). This randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study included a screening visit, a treatment visit, and a follow-up visit 1 week after treatment. Recordings of visual analog scales (VAS) pain intensity scores at maximum mouth opening (main efficacy variable) and at jaw rest were made directly before a 1-ml i.a. injection into one TMJ of either 1.0mg morphine-HCl, 0.1mg morphine-HCl, or saline (placebo). ⋯ In conclusion, one i.a. injection of 0.1mg morphine significantly increased the pain pressure threshold and mouth opening ability, but evidence for the analgesic property of the locally applied opioid was inconclusive. No dose-effect relation and no significant short-term analgesic property were seen. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of the reduced VAS pain intensity score was not clinically relevant at the 1-week follow-up.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study.
A multicentre double blind, randomised, placebo controlled 7-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin 1800 or 2400 mg/day in treating postherpetic neuralgia. Three hundred and thirty-four men and women aged at least 18 years (mean 73) received gabapentin 1800 or 2400 mg daily or placebo in three divided doses with a forced titration schedule. The primary outcome measure was change in average daily pain diary score (baseline week v final week). ⋯ Overall gabapentin was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were dizziness and somnolence, particularly during the titration phase. Thus, this study confirms the role of gabapentin as an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for postherpetic neuralgia.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.
Pain intensity is frequently measured on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS), where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. However, it is difficult to interpret the clinical importance of changes from baseline on this scale (such as a 1- or 2-point change). To date, there are no data driven estimates for clinically important differences in pain intensity scales used for chronic pain studies. ⋯ The relationship between percent change and the PGIC was also consistent regardless of baseline pain, while higher baseline scores required larger raw changes to represent a clinically important difference. The application of these results to future studies may provide a standard definition of clinically important improvement in clinical trials of chronic pain therapies. Use of a standard outcome across chronic pain studies would greatly enhance the comparability, validity, and clinical applicability of these studies.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Prediction of physician visits and prescription medicine use for back pain.
The primary purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which specific patient attitudes and beliefs about medical care and self-care for back pain predict future healthcare use. An automated database allowed examination of the predictive relationships in two primary care patient samples. In general, beliefs that physicians should find a definitive cause and permanent cure for back pain predicted neither physician visits nor prescription medication fills. ⋯ Factor analyses of the item set yielded three factors, but inconclusive results; the internal consistency of the identified sub-scales was only moderate. However, findings that a subset of items predicted physician visits and prescriptions medication fills, and was sensitive to change following a self-care intervention, suggest avenues for improving measurement of self-care orientation. These findings help clarify specific patient attitudes and beliefs that are related to healthcare utilization and suggest that a subset of these beliefs can be modified through a brief educational intervention.