Clinical therapeutics
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialReversal of central nervous system effects by flumazenil after intravenous conscious sedation with midazolam: report of a multicenter clinical study. The Flumazenil in Intravenous Conscious Sedation with Midazolam Multicenter Study Group I.
Flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, reverses the residual central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines. In this US double-blind, multicenter study, the efficacy of flumazenil was compared with that of placebo in antagonizing the effects of midazolam, a benzodiazepine used to induce intravenous conscious sedation. The mean dose of flumazenil was 0.7 mg, administered intravenously. ⋯ Flumazenil was well tolerated. Dizziness (10%) and nausea (9%) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. Results of this study demonstrate that flumazenil antagonizes the central nervous system effects of midazolam after intravenous conscious sedation.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialReversal of central benzodiazepine effects by flumazenil after conscious sedation produced by intravenous diazepam. The Flumazenil in Intravenous Conscious Sedation with Diazepam Multicenter Study Group I.
Flumazenil is a competitive benzodiazepine antagonist that rapidly reverses the residual effects of benzodiazepines following intravenous conscious sedation. In a double-blind, multicenter study, postoperative patients who had been sedated with intravenous diazepam were randomly allocated to receive intravenous doses of flumazenil (0.4 mg to 1 mg) or placebo. Levels of sedation and psychomotor impairment were evaluated prestudy, at baseline, and at 6 intervals from 5 to 180 minutes posttreatment. ⋯ There were no serious adverse experiences related to the test drug. Flumazenil provided prompt, controlled reversal of residual effects, especially sedation, in the majority (84%) of patients recovering from intravenous conscious sedation induced by diazepam. For most (70%) of these flumazenil-treated patients, the reversal was maintained throughout the 180-minute assessment.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEffect of intravenous flumazenil on reversal of the central effects of midazolam used with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia in hospitalized patients: report of a multicenter, double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Hospitalized Patients Study Group I.
Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine central nervous system (CNS) depressant widely used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, is often supplemented with short-acting opioids for general anesthesia. Administered postoperatively, flumazenil, a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, reverses the CNS sedative effects of midazolam. In a double-blind clinical trial in hospitalized patients, flumazenil, administered postoperatively at an average intravenous dose of 0.89 mg (range: 0.4 mg to 1 mg), was more effective than placebo in reversing sedation and other residual effects of benzodiazepines in patients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam (mean dose 29 mg) in conjunction with fentanyl (mean dose 0.4 mg) or sufentanil (mean dose 0.056 mg). ⋯ Measurements of psychomotor function and memory also showed significant between-group differences. Flumazenil, compared with placebo, was not associated with a substantially greater frequency of operative-site pain. These results demonstrate that the efficacy and safety of flumazenil were not compromised by the addition of a short-acting opioid to the anesthetic regimen.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Sep 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL in black and white hypertensive patients.
The efficacy and tolerability of Prinivil and Procardia XL were compared in 135 (67 black, 68 white) patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension. The goal of therapy was to achieve and maintain a supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of > 90 mmHg or a decrease in SDBP > or = 10 mmHg. Patients received Prinivil 10 to 40 mg once daily or Procardia XL 30 to 120 mg once daily during a titration period of 2 to 8 weeks to achieve the goal blood pressure before a 4-week maintenance period. ⋯ There were no differences in treatment responses in either the black or white hypertensive subgroups. Thus both drugs were equally effective in black and white patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Both drugs were generally well tolerated, but the number of adverse experiences requiring discontinuation of therapy was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in patients receiving Procardia XL.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Sep 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialRandomized comparison of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in patients with uncomplicated gonorrhea.
Cefotaxime is a third-generation cephalosporin with excellent in vitro antimicrobial activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. A single, 1-gm, intramuscular dose has previously been shown to be effective in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. A randomized, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a lower, 500-mg dose of cefotaxime in comparison with ceftriaxone 250 mg, the standard treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea. ⋯ Bacteriologic eradication rates were 95% in the cefotaxime group and 100% in the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.119). Adverse events that were possibly related to the study drug occurred in 3% and 8% of patients in the cefotaxime and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. Cefotaxime 500 mg appears to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to ceftriaxone 250 mg for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea.