Clinical therapeutics
-
Clinical therapeutics · May 1997
Review Case ReportsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, traditional opioids, and tramadol: contrasting therapies for the treatment of chronic pain.
The treatment of chronic pain is an important function of physicians. In the United States, available drug treatments for chronic pain currently include simple analgesics such as acetaminophen, salicylates and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, traditional opioid drugs, and adjuvant agents (eg, antidepressants, anticonvulsants). ⋯ Tramadol is an effective analgesic that works through a combined mechanism of weak mu receptor binding and the inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake. Tramadol has a favorable adverse-effect profile and therefore is likely to have an important role in the management of chronic pain syndromes.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Mar 1997
ReviewThe use of claims databases for outcomes research: rationale, challenges, and strategies.
Health care payers and policy makers need information about the cost and effectiveness of medical treatments. While randomized controlled trials historically are the primary source of medical information, they are expensive and labor-intensive, and often have limited utility for answering questions about "real-world" patient populations. These problems have led to an increasing reliance on claims database research in making policy decisions about treatment options. ⋯ Recommendations for avoiding or minimizing threats to internal validity, construct validity, and external validity are: (1) use of a study design that includes comparisons; (2) ensuring that the study design and conclusions are consistent with the database; (3) a priori conceptual modeling of the research question; (4) use of appropriate constructs; (5) explicit examination of alternative explanations for study findings; (6) sensitivity analyses of key assumptions; (7) awareness of the distinction between statistical and practical significance of findings; (8) generalization only when appropriate; and (9) reporting of relevant information. Given that any study design or data source has limitations, we hope that this paper will encourage a philosophy of methodological pluralism in outcomes research. Awareness and accurate reporting of validity issues will strengthen and extend the information resources currently available to decision makers.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jan 1997
Cost-effectiveness of long-term intrathecal morphine therapy for pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome.
A decision analytic study was conducted using computer simulation to project the outcomes in a simulated cohort of patients whose treatment for back surgery had failed. The objective of this study was to estimate the direct cost of intrathecal morphine therapy (IMT) delivered via an implantable pump relative to alternative therapy (medical management) over a 60-month course of treatment. IMT administered by way of an implantable pump can provide effective pain relief for selected patients whose less invasive treatment modalities have failed. ⋯ In a sensitivity analysis, the best case (low adverse event rate, low cost) estimate was $53,468 ($891/mo), whereas the worst case (high adverse event rate, high cost) estimate was $125,102 ($2085/mo). Cost-effectiveness estimates ranged from $7212 (best case) to $12,276 (worst case) per year of pain relief. Results from a computer simulation designed to collect the costs not included in previous empiric research indicate that IMT appears to be cost-effective when compared with alternative (medical) management for selected patients when the duration of therapy exceeds 12 to 22 months.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jan 1997
A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the use of dexrazoxane in preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with stage IIIB or IV metastatic breast cancer.
A Markov model was developed to determine the cost of treating patients with stage IIIB or IV metastatic breast cancer with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) and dexrazoxane (administered after six courses of FAC) versus FAC alone. The primary end point in our economic study was cost per cardiac event avoided. Cost per life-year saved was also calculated, even though the survival advantage needs to be confirmed in follow-up studies. ⋯ Analyses showed that therapy with dexrazoxane costs $5661.77 per cardiac event prevented. Sensitivity analyses on model variables were performed and showed that the basic results of the model did not change when parameters were varied. The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of dexrazoxane as shown by the results of the current study encourage further investigation of the uses of dexrazoxane in other populations and against other comparators.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jul 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEfficacy, tolerability, and effects on quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus amlodipine, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with essential hypertension.
A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and effects on quality of life associated with treatment regimens including the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan, with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) added as needed, with regimens including the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine with HCTZ added as needed. The trial included patients whose sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) measurements were between 95 and 114 mm Hg, inclusive, at placebo baseline. Patients were randomized to receive either losartan or amlodipine in a double-masked, double-dummy fashion. ⋯ In particular, drug-related edema was more common in patients receiving the amlodipine regimen than in those receiving the losartan regimen (11% vs 1%). Patients in the amlodipine arm reported significantly more bother due to edema, regardless of whether edema was present at baseline, than did patients in the losartan arm (12% vs 2%), although overall quality of life was not different in the two treatment groups. This study demonstrates that a regimen of losartan with HCTZ added as needed, when compared with a regimen of amlodipine with HCTZ added as needed, provides comparable efficacy and superior tolerability and less bother to patients with respect to edema.