Clinical therapeutics
-
Clinical therapeutics · May 2015
ReviewGut-Microbiota-Brain Axis and Its Effect on Neuropsychiatric Disorders With Suspected Immune Dysregulation.
Gut microbiota regulate intestinal function and health. However, mounting evidence indicates that they can also influence the immune and nervous systems and vice versa. This article reviews the bidirectional relationship between the gut microbiota and the brain, termed the microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis, and discusses how it contributes to the pathogenesis of certain disorders that may involve brain inflammation. ⋯ Recognition of the relationship between the MGB axis and the neuroimmune systems provides a novel approach for better understanding and management of these disorders. Appropriate preventive measures early in life or corrective measures such as use of psychobiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and flavonoids are discussed.
-
Clinical therapeutics · May 2015
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialNovel Buccal Film Formulation of Buprenorphine-Naloxone for the Maintenance Treatment of Opioid Dependence: A 12-Week Conversion Study.
The purpose of this study was to provide a preliminary assessment of the safety, tolerability, symptom control, and acceptability of buprenorphine-naloxone buccal film (BBN) for the maintenance treatment of opioid dependence in patients converted from buprenorphine-naloxone sublingual tablet or film (SLBN), as well as to determine the conversion ratio for switching patients from SLBN to BBN. ⋯ Although these results should be considered preliminary due to the open-label design, BBN was overall safe and well tolerated, and seemed to provide adequate symptom control, in the treatment of opioid-dependent subjects previously controlled on SLBN for a minimum of 30 days. There was good adherence to study medication and favorable patient acceptance of the buccal formulation. The SLBN/BBN buprenorphine conversion ratio was 2:1. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01666119.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Apr 2015
ReviewThe Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma.
Blocking the interaction between the programmed cell death (PD)-1 protein and one of its ligands, PD-L1, has been reported to have impressive antitumor responses. Therapeutics targeting this pathway are currently in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are the first of this anti-PD-1 pathway family of checkpoint inhibitors to gain accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. Nivolumab has been associated with improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated wild-type serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf proto-oncogene BRAF melanoma. Although the most mature data are in the treatment of melanoma, the FDA has granted approval of nivolumab for squamous cell lung cancer and the breakthrough therapy designation to immune- checkpoint inhibitors for use in other cancers: nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, for Hodgkin lymphoma, and MPDL-3280A, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, for bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Here we review the literature on PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade and focus on the reported clinical studies that have included patients with melanoma. ⋯ This family of immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefits not only patients with metastatic melanoma but also those with historically less responsive tumor types. Although a subset of patients responds to single-agent blockade, the initial trial of checkpoint-inhibitor combinations has reported a potential to improve response rates. Combination therapies appear to be a means of increasing response rates, albeit with increased immune-related adverse events. As these treatments become available to patients, education regarding the recognition and management of immune-related effects of immune-checkpoint blockade will be essential for maximizing clinical benefit.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Apr 2015
The Affordable Care Act: how can we know whether the intended consequences are occurring and the unintended ones are being avoided?
When the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law on March 23, 2010, policymakers intended that it would improve access to care by lowering the uninsured rate, improve health care quality, and lower costs. Now, 4 years later, researchers and policymakers need to ask whether those intentions have been realized or whether the ACA has produced unintended consequences that affect patient care. This article raises the importance of assessing what changes in patient access and clinical care have occurred, points out how challenging those assessments may be to conduct, and concludes with a call to action about how those challenges might be addressed.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Apr 2015
Impact of Switching From High-Efficacy Lipid-Lowering Therapies to Generic Simvastatin on LDL-C Levels and LDL-C Goal Attainment Among High-Risk Primary and Secondary Prevention Populations in the United Kingdom.
High cholesterol, especially high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity/mortality. Switching from high-efficacy lipid-lowering therapies (HETs) to simvastatin might lead to sub-optimal control of LDL-C. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of switching from HETs to generic simvastatin on LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment among the high-risk primary and secondary prevention populations in the United Kingdom. ⋯ Among the high risk CVD population in UK, switching to simvastatin from HET, especially rosuvastatin and simvastatin/ezetimibe, resulted in an increase in LDL-C levels and lower goal attainment. These historical data reinforce the appropriateness of the changes in the new Joint British Guideline (JBS3) which no longer recommends starting simvastatin 40 mg.