Neurosurgery
-
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has transformed spinal surgery by minimizing tissue disruption, reducing recovery times, and lowering complication rates compared with traditional open procedures. MISS uses smaller incisions, specialized tools, and advanced imaging to treat conditions such as degenerative disk disease, trauma, and tumors. Techniques such as endoscopic spine surgery and tubular retractors have expanded its applications, enabling effective treatment with less postoperative pain and faster mobilization. ⋯ Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, when combined with MISS, improve outcomes by reducing hospital stays and postoperative pain. Complications such as dural tears and hardware misplacement, although less common than in open surgery, require careful management, with techniques such as intraoperative imaging and robotic navigation aiding in complication prevention. Continued innovation in MISS will broaden its application and improve safety and patient outcomes across various spinal pathologies.
-
The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique, pioneered by Harms and Rolinger in 1982 and further refined in the early 2000s by Rosenberg and Mummaneni and later by Foley and Lefkowitz, uses Kambin triangle to access the disc space, thecal sac, and nerve roots. The minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach to TLIF minimizes soft tissue disruption and spinal segment destabilization, offering benefits such as reduced operative times, blood loss, complications, and postoperative opiate use, with comparable fusion rates to open techniques. Despite these advantages, MIS interbody selection poses challenges, with the MIS TLIF preferred for L4-5 fusions when lordosis restoration is not needed. ⋯ Awake MIS TLIF, incorporating conscious sedation and local anesthesia, offers additional benefits of faster discharge and reduced postoperative pain. Some authors have also started using endoscopic techniques as well to further minimize tissue trauma. The integration of these advanced techniques and technologies in MIS TLIF continues to improve surgical outcomes and expands the applicability of this minimally invasive approach, making it a valuable tool in spine surgery.
-
Neuromonitoring in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) provides real-time feedback to surgeons and enhances surgical precision for improved patient safety. Since the 1970s, established techniques like somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and electromyography have been integrated into spine surgeries, significantly reducing the risk of neurological complications. These neuromonitoring modalities have been crucial, particularly in complex procedures with limited direct visualization. ⋯ This review explores the historical development, current techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions of neuromonitoring in MISS. It emphasizes the critical role of these technologies in enhancing surgical outcomes and patient care. As MISS continues to evolve, adopting next-generation neuromonitoring systems, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, will play a pivotal role in advancing the efficacy and safety of spine surgeries.
-
Observational Study
Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: An Analysis of Claims in the Netherlands.
Studying malpractice claims is important to improve quality of health care and patient safety and to educate the individual healthcare providers. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics of neurosurgical claims in the Netherlands. ⋯ Neurosurgery-related malpractice claims primarily involved spinal pathology and were mostly related to alleged treatment errors. Most claims did not result in compensation because there seemed to be no liability or culpable injury. However, the annual risk for a claim for Dutch neurosurgeons is considerable.
-
Anatomic features of neuromas have been explored in imaging studies. However, there has been limited research into these features using resected, ex vivo human neuroma specimens. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence that time may have on neuroma growth and size, and the clinical significance of these parameters. ⋯ This study suggests that neuromas seem to continue to grow over time and that smaller nerves may form relatively larger neuromas. In addition, sensory nerves develop relatively larger neuromas compared with mixed nerves. Neuroma size does not appear to correlate with pain severity. These findings may stimulate future research efforts and contribute to a better understanding of symptomatic neuroma development.