Neurosurgery
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
The cost effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgical resection in the treatment of solitary metastatic brain tumors.
Solitary metastatic brain tumors are the most common intracranial neoplasms encountered by neurosurgeons. Surgical resection of brain metastasis with whole brain radiotherapy (WBR) significantly increases survival in comparison with WBR alone. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SR) seems to provide results that are similar to those of surgical resection. ⋯ A sensitivity analysis revealed that large changes in key assumptions would be required to change the analysis outcome. Equalization of the incremental cost effectiveness of the two treatments would require one of the following: 1) a 38.7% reduction in SR annual case volume, 2) a 34.7% increase in SR procedure cost, 3) a 18.8% reduction in surgical resection procedure cost, 4) a 240.5% increase in SR morbidity cost, 5) a 12.7% reduction in SR median survival, 6) a 16.8% increase in surgical resection median survival. Elimination of all surgical resection morbidity cost would still result in superior incremental cost effectiveness for SR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
-
A meta-analysis of published randomized studies comparing prophylactic antibiotics to placebo in craniotomies was performed. Ten studies were examined; eight met criteria for inclusion into the meta-analysis. The analysis showed an advantage of antibiotics over placebo at the P < 10-8 level. ⋯ Cumulative meta-analyses showed that this conclusion could have been confidently drawn by 1988, after only four of the eight eligible trials had been published. Trials published since that time have reinforced these conclusions but have not significantly altered them. Future studies should compare proposed new antibiotic regimens with one of those already demonstrated to be effective, not with a placebo.