Neurological research
-
Neurological research · Jun 2000
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialThe benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery.
Neuronavigation, today a routine method in neurosurgery, has not yet been systematically assessed in direct comparison with conventional microsurgical techniques. The aim of the present study was the direct comparison of the impact of neuronavigation on glioblastoma surgery regarding time consumption, extent of tumor removal and survival. For each of 52 patients operated for primary glioblastoma with neuronavigation, a patient operated on without navigation was matched. ⋯ Survival was longer in patients operated on using neuronavigation (median 13.4 vs. 11.1 months). Neuronavigation increases radicality in glioblastoma resection without prolonging operating time. Regarding the problem of brain shift, neuronavigation should be optimized by intraoperative real-time imaging.
-
Neurological research · Jun 2000
Effect of stimulation of the dorsal aspect of the cervical spinal cord on local cerebral blood flow and EEG in the cat.
Currently there is considerable interest in electrical stimulation of the dorsal aspect of the cervical spinal cord as a potentially effective therapy for persistent vegetative patients. The authors assessed change in the local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) and electroencephalogram (EEG) in the cat following spinal cord stimulation (SCS). In 31 adult cats under isoflurane anesthesia, an electrode for SCS was introduced epidurally to the midline of the C2-C3 segment. ⋯ EEG showed spike and wave or polyspikes after SCS in two animals of the 6V group, but not in the 2V and 4V groups, and moreover a moderate increase of the background activity at only 4V. The present data suggested that SCS at 4V can provide the appropriate microcirculatory enhancement with less harmful influence which continues to increase 30 min after SCS, although the exact mechanism should be elucidated continuously. Within the limitation of animal experiments, this study could provide the logical basis for determining the condition of SCS.
-
The understanding of the mode of action of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as treatment of neuropathic pain is still fragmentary. SCS evolved from the gate-control theory postulating a spinal modulation of noxious inflow, but there is little evidence that SCS influences nociceptive pain; pain relief in peripheral vascular disease and angina pectoris is presumably secondary to other SCS effects. In man, SCS may effectively abolish both continuous and evoked pain (tactile/thermal allodynia) whereas induced, acute nociceptive pain is unaffected. ⋯ Preliminary results indicate that gabapentin may have a similar effect. GABAergic and adenosine-related mechanisms conceivably represent only examples of a number of putative receptor systems involved in SCS. Clinical trials have been initiated exploring the possibility to improve the efficacy of SCS by concomitant pharmacotherapy.
-
Neurological research · Apr 2000
ReviewA neuromodulation strategy for rational therapy of complex brain injury states.
We review initial efforts at neuromodulation in the vegetative state and organize several aspects of recent studies of the underlying neurobiology of catastrophic brain injuries. An innovative strategy for patient and target selection for neuromodulation of impaired cognitive function is outlined. Scientific and ethical issues that will attend future efforts to appropriately risk-stratify patients and initiate interventions with therapeutic intent are considered.
-
Electrical stimulation of selected peripheral nerves for treatment of intractable pain has been used inconsistently over the past 30 years due to difficulties in clarifying appropriate indications, utilizing approved device technology, and standardizing the surgical techniques. Circumferential electrodes treating mononeuropathies have given way to paddle electrode techniques and, most recently, the application of percutaneous wire electrode methods will allow for minimally invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for certain intractable CRPS and other painful monoeuropathies.