Annals of emergency medicine
-
Previous studies in dogs have shown resuscitation from prolonged cardiac arrest to conscious survival to be more effective with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) than with standard advanced cardiac life support. This study compared cardiovascular resuscitability with CPB only after varying periods of cardiac arrest without artificial circulatory support in a canine model. Group 1 (ten) was subjected to ventricular fibrillation for 15 minutes; group 2 (ten) for 20 minutes; and group 3 (ten) for 30 minutes. ⋯ In groups 1 and 2, CPB reperfusion allowed for successful defibrillation in less than five minutes, weaning from CPB in all dogs at four hours, and stable spontaneous circulation thereafter. In group 3, only five of ten dogs could be weaned from bypass at four hours, and all died early with myocardial necroses. It was concluded that CPB may be of value in the setting of prolonged cardiac arrest when advanced cardiac life support has not been provided or is unable to restore spontaneous heart-beat.
-
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) reperfusion has demonstrated improved resuscitation rates in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest models. To investigate the effectiveness of CPB reperfusion in an ischemic cardiac arrest setting, simulating the clinical scenario of myocardial ischemia preceding sudden cardiac death, we developed a canine model of acute myocardial infarction followed by ventricular fibrillation. Sixteen dogs were randomly assigned to two groups. ⋯ Myocardial ischemic and necrotic areas were determined in four-hour survivors by dual histochemical staining. All animals were resuscitated; all eight group 1 and six of eight group 2 animals survived to four hours. With the onset of CPB, coronary perfusion pressures increased significantly by 68.6 +/- 31.8 (SD) mm Hg in group 1 and 56.2 +/- 34.6 mm Hg in group 2 over those obtained with CPR (P less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)