Annals of emergency medicine
-
In contrast to the current consensus that governs the mechanics of prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), uniform criteria for determining when to initiate, withhold, or terminate ACLS in the field do not exist. Most emergency medical services (EMS) permit paramedics and other prehospital providers to withhold resuscitation when the victim obviously is dead, but the accuracy and appropriateness of this judgement in the field have not been subjected to empiric research. Do-not-resuscitate orders on patients in community settings often are problematic when paramedics and other prehospital providers are governed by standing orders that require them to initiate CPR when it is indicated medically. ⋯ Currently, few services permit paramedics to terminate ACLS in the field when such efforts fail to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. Studies have demonstrated convincingly that the rapid transport of such patients for further attempts at resuscitation in the hospital yields dismal rates of survival. The costs, risks, and benefits of this practice in community settings must be reviewed carefully to allocate EMS resources in an optimal manner.
-
The methods of obtaining data and assessing protocol compliance in prehospital research can present difficulties. The Norwalk Hospital Mobile Emergency Medical Service paramedics use a minicassette recorder carried in the monitor-defibrillator pack during their participation in a cardiac arrest study. ⋯ With this recorder, the investigator is able to accurately identify when interventions occurred and the patients' response to therapy. The use of a minicassette recorder can facilitate data collection for prehospital research with minimal disruption for the paramedic providing care.
-
Patients who suffer an in-hospital cardiac arrest represent a neglected and underutilized resource for resuscitation research. There exists an unwritten, but widely held, belief among resuscitation researchers that the in-hospital arrest population is unsuitable for resuscitation research because it is composed mostly of patients whose cardiac arrest is the terminal event of a fatal illness. Despite the large numbers of hospitalized patients on whom cardiac resuscitation is attempted each year, there are few reports and even less true research devoted to this clinical problem. This article, which is intended to be provocative, reviews and summarizes the existing literature on in-hospital resuscitation from cardiac arrest, considers the advantages of resuscitation research in this setting, and concludes with a challenge to resuscitation researchers.
-
To enhance comparability in reports on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, an international task force recently developed a set of guidelines for uniform terminology, definitions, and data collection for outcome research on cardiac arrest--the Utstein style. Because the data collection recommended is limited to information available through emergency medical services systems, the potential for bias in comparisons of cardiac arrest outcomes remains. By expanding data collection to include the identification of all cases of cardiac arrest in the community, including patients who do not present for care by an emergency medical services system, a population-based approach can be achieved. We review the strengths and limitations of both emergency medical services-based and population-based data collection to assess outcomes of cardiac arrest, outline practical steps required to implement a population-based approach, and suggest that extension of the Utstein style guidelines to include all cardiac arrest cases within a defined population is needed to minimize potential bias in comparisons of cardiac arrest outcomes across communities or over time.
-
The Utstein style for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was developed to solve a major problem in resuscitation research. Outcome measures related to cardiac arrest are difficult to evaluate or compare because there have been no uniform definitions or uniform agreements on what data to report. Widespread acceptance of the Utstein style will lead to a better understanding of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.