Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1992
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by ondansetron].
This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of oral ondansetron, a new 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. It included 60 patients, randomly assigned to two groups, and receiving orally, 1 h before induction of anaesthesia, either 8 mg of ondansetron (n = 29) or a placebo (n = 30). One patient was excluded. ⋯ The differences between the groups were statistically significant: p = 0.025 for nausea and p = 0.042 for vomiting. It is concluded that oral ondansetron, 8 mg taken orally 1 h before surgery, significantly reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first twelve postoperative hours. As it is easy to use and has no side-effects, it might be of interest in day-case surgery patients, despite its high cost.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Analgesic effect of ibuprofen in pain after episiotomy].
The relief of post-episiotomy pain was investigated in three groups of women, ranked ASA 1 or 2, using either a single dose of 400 mg of ibuprofen (n = 31), or 1 g of paracetamol (n = 28) or placebo (n = 31). Pain intensity was assessed with a visual analogic scale, a verbal scale and pain relief scores after half an hour, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h. The day after treatment, patients rated the quality of pain relief, and were asked whether they wished to take again the same drug for the same type of pain. ⋯ On the day after treatment, 22 patients from the ibuprofen group considered pain relief to have been good or excellent, versus 8 and 5 in the paracetamol and placebo groups respectively (p less than 0.001). Similarly, 24 patients from the ibuprofen group would accept the same drug again for the same type of pain, as opposed to 8 and 5 from the paracetamol and placebo groups respectively (p less than 0.01). The only side-effect reported was abdominal pain in one patient (placebo group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Propofol versus etomidate in short-time urologic surgery].
Thirty patients, scheduled for short urological surgical procedures and ranked ASA 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to two homogenous groups. In group P, they were given a 2 mg.kg-1 bolus of propofol and 10 micrograms.kg-1 of alfentanil, followed by a continuous infusion of propofol (5 mg.kg-1.h-1) and 5 micrograms.kg-1 doses of alfentanil. In group E, they were given a 0.3 mg.kg-1 bolus of etomidate, followed by an infusion (1.5 mg.kg-1.h-1). ⋯ On the other hand, in group E, there was little or no haemodynamic alteration, but there often was a trismus at induction. Hypoxia also occurred during induction with etomidate, being severe enough in one case to require tracheal intubation and artificial ventilation. The reasons for this hypoxia seemed to be the apnoea and the trismus, which tends to hinder assisted ventilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparative study of conventional spinal anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in gynecological surgery].
A prospective study was carried out to compare the qualities of spinal block with those of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA). It included 63 patients, ranked ASA 1 or 2, aged between 35 and 75 years, scheduled for gynaecological surgery due to last more than 2 hours, and randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group (n = 34), spinal anaesthesia was carried out with the patients sitting, in the L3-4 interspace, using 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.4 mg of adrenaline. ⋯ In the CSEA group, excellent analgesia was obtained in all patients. Sensory blockade lasted 308 +/- 48 min at the T12 level, versus 162 +/- 51 min in the spinal group (p < 0.025), and 361 +/- 51 min at the L2 level, versus 210 < 44 min in the other group (p < 0.025). "Topping up" was possible with the epidural catheter only, thus raising the level of sensory blockade, making it deeper, and increasing its duration. It avoids the use of general anaesthesia in case of failed spinal blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1992
Review Case Reports[Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine injuries using a fiber optic laryngoscope].
Eleven patients, with a cervical spine injury and scheduled for elective cervical spine fusion at least 48 h after their initial trauma, were intubated using a new fiberoptic laryngoscope (Bullard). This technique uses either a semi-rigid guide independent of the laryngoscope blade, or a rigid one attached to the blade. The cervical spine was immobilized with either a collar or a halo. ⋯ This is confirmed by the time required, 44 +/- 22 sec for the rigid guide, and 97 +/- 92 sec for the semi-rigid one. In the patient in whom this technique failed at the first attempt, endotracheal intubation was carried out by the nasal route and controlled by the fiberoptic laryngoscope. This technique enables a rapid and easy orotracheal intubation in trauma patients with an immobilized cervical spine, but careful training is necessary.