Resuscitation
-
Review Historical Article
The respiratory system during resuscitation: a review of the history, risk of infection during assisted ventilation, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation strategies for patients with an unprotected airway.
The fear of acquiring infectious diseases has resulted in reluctance among healthcare professionals and the lay public to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation. However, the benefit of basic life support for a patient in cardiopulmonary or respiratory arrest greatly outweighs the risk for secondary infection in the rescuer or the patient. The distribution of ventilation volume between lungs and stomach in the unprotected airway depends on patient variables such as lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, airway resistance and respiratory system compliance, and the technique applied while performing basic or advanced airway support, such as head position, inflation flow rate and time, which determine upper airway pressure. ⋯ During bag-valve-mask ventilation of patients in respiratory or cardiac arrest with oxygen supplementation (> or = 40% oxygen), a tidal volume of 6-7 ml kg(-1) ( approximately 500 ml) given over 1-2 s until the chest rises is recommended. For bag-valve-mask ventilation with room-air, a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) (700-1000 ml) in an adult given over 2 s until the chest rises clearly is recommended. During mouth-to-mouth ventilation, a breath over 2 s sufficient to make the chest rise clearly (a tidal volume of approximately 10 ml kg(-1) approximately 700-1000 ml in an adult) is recommended.
-
Mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 99 in Singapore was a large-scale multi-organisational effort to increase awareness and impart basic cardiac life support skills to the lay public. Mass CPR demonstrations followed by small group manikin practice with instructor guidance was conducted simultaneously in three centres, four times a day. ⋯ Two surveys, for 'I's and 'P's were conducted with respondent rates of 65.8% and 50%, respectively. 73.6% of the P-respondents ('P-R's) indicated that they attended the event to increase their knowledge. 66.9% were willing to attend a more comprehensive CPR course. Concerns and perceptions in performing bystander CPR were assessed.
-
We evaluated the type and severity of injuries and the possible influence of a helicopter staffed by a physician on the outcome of 71 consecutive occupants ejected from a four-wheel vehicle ejected occupants who were cared for by the Swiss Air Rescue Helicopter team from January 1994 to February 1999. The investigation and the data collection were planned prospectively. The following data were collected for each patient ejected from a four wheel vehicle: (1) demographic information; (2) type of injury; (3) vital signs on scene, in flight and at hospital; (4) hospital diagnosis; (5) injury severity score; (6) secondary transfer; (7) length of stay in hospital and on intensive care; and (8) outcome at hospital discharge. ⋯ In conclusion, ejection from a four-wheel vehicle causes more severe injuries and requires a high number of advanced life support manoeuvres. Based on the mechanism of injury alone, patients ejected from four-wheel vehicles should automatically receive a response from the best available pre-hospital team. In our system, this means the dispatch of a physician staffed helicopter.
-
To determine whether the introduction of the Medical Emergency Team (MET) system designed to provide immediate help for seriously ill patients: (i) changed the pattern of ICU patient transfers from the wards; and (ii) improved hospital survival rates. ⋯ More information is needed to demonstrate that the MET system improves patient survival. The study also highlights the importance of taking proactive measures, which should include providing in-service education on the benefits of early identification and treatment of patients who are at risk of acute deterioration, raising awareness and changing attitudes in hospitals when introducing system such as the MET.