Resuscitation
-
Many studies (several even before American Heart Association recommended in 1973 that lay public be trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR] have documented that retention of CPR skills is poor, unaffected by modifications in curriculum or whether the students are lay or professional. We chose to investigate what actually occurs during a CPR course, and gained the following insights: despite clearly defined curricula, we found that instructors did not teach in a standardized way. Practice time was limited and errors in performance were not corrected. ⋯ As a result of these studies, we discovered that the problem of poor retention of CPR skills may lie not with the learner or the curriculum, but with the instructor. But, since lives are being saved with bystander CPR, does this documented poor retention matter? Perhaps the solution is not only to improve instructor training to make certain that students receive adequate practice time and accurate skill evaluation, but also to modify the criteria for correct performance when testing for retention. These criteria should be based on the minimum CPR skills that are required to sustain life for the critical 4-8 min before defibrillation and other advanced cardiac life support are delivered.
-
Review Comparative Study
Direct mechanical ventricular actuation: a review.
Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) is a non-blood contacting method of circulatory support that can be rapidly instituted for resuscitation. DMVA is superior to conventional methods (open and closed-chest cardiac massage) in providing reliable cardiovascular stabilization for resuscitation following cardiac arrest. Furthermore, DMVA has important advantages including rapid application, technical simplicity, and avoidance of blood contact compared to other resuscitation devices (cardiopulmonary bypass and blood pumps). This review summarizes laboratory and clinical applications of DMVA.
-
Central venous catheterization is one of the most common invasive vascular procedures performed in hospitals today. Though catheter related sepsis occurs only in a small percentage of catheterized patients, this complication has a tremendous impact due to the ubiquitous use of central venous catheters and consequent morbidity and even mortality. ⋯ Particular emphasis is placed upon recent research and clinical advances in this field, which have clarified important question and suggested promising approaches to the prevention and treatment of catheter bacteremia. The excessive morbidity and mortality due to catheter-related sepsis can be markedly decreased, by attention to simple infection control methods, and by future implementation of new experimental techniques.
-
A decade of experience with resuscitative thoracotomy for the trauma victim in extremis has been gained since the pioneering efforts of Mattox and his associates in 1974. It appears, from a review of the various reports from different trauma centers, that there is an emergence of a consensus as to the best indications for the procedure. ⋯ It is widely accepted that the best results for ERT are in patients with cardiac tamponade. The prognosis is hopeless in patients without vital signs after sustaining blunt trauma.
-
In spite of good correlations between cardiac output measurements by impedance and established invasive procedures (dye- and thermo-dilution) reported by numerous authors it is doubtful uptil now whether calculations of stroke volume according to the formula of Kubicek et al. (1974) can provide absolutely reliable results. The origin of the dz/dt curve and influencing factors of impedance wave have to be cleared up prior to the total acception of impedance cardiography as a reliable method for determining non-invasive stroke volume. This is true in spite of the agreement of all authors we know, that the reproducibility of the impedance cardiography values is as good as in dye or thermo-dilution measurements. ⋯ The reason for interindividual differences in the thoracic impedance at a given reduction of body water are due to anatomical differences, intrapulmonary air volume and pressure, location of the electrodes, electrical conductivity of the tissue and, above all, due to the position of the body. Therefore if transthoracic impedance is determined sequentially measurements must be performed with special attention to the position of the body to get reproducible results. Rapid infusion of colloids or blood transfusion may decrease transthoracic impedance due to intravascular volume expansion even at a net fluid lost during forced furosemide-induced diuresis or extracorporal hemodialysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)