Resuscitation
-
Prolongation of the QT interval is a known risk factor for syncope, seizures and sudden cardiac death. Most patients with QT prolongation have an acquired cause, but congenital forms of QT prolongation are being increasingly recognized. ⋯ Here, a young patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to congenital LQTS illustrates critical exceptions to the current ACLS treatment algorithms for ventricular fibrillation and unstable ventricular tachycardia when QT prolongation is congenital in origin. A clarified ACLS algorithm is proposed.
-
Do not-attempt-resuscitate orders are fundamental for allowing patients to die peacefully without inappropriate resuscitation attempts. Once the decision has been made it is imperative to record this information accurately. However, during a related research projected we noted that documentation was poor and we thought that the introduction of a pre-printed Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) form would improve the documentation process. ⋯ A pre-printed DNAR form can improve documentation significantly but it has little effect in encouraging patient involvement in the decision-making process.
-
Sufficiently strong defibrillation shocks will cause temporary or permanent damage to the heart. Weak defibrillation shocks do not cause any damage to the heart but also do not defibrillate. A relevant and practical question is what range of shock energies is most likely to defibrillate while not causing damage to the heart. ⋯ Although many patients can be defibrillated with 150 J (2.2 J/kg) biphasic shocks, some patients may require biphasic shocks up to 360 J (5 J/kg) to be defibrillated. Studies still need to be performed comparing the efficacy and damaging effects of 360 J biphasic shocks to 150 J biphasic shocks. Until those studies are completed, it seems reasonable to use the same 360 J (5 J/kg) energy limit for biphasic shocks as for monophasic shocks.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
To blow or not to blow: a randomised controlled trial of compression-only and standard telephone CPR instructions in simulated cardiac arrest.
This randomised controlled trial used a manikin model of cardiac arrest to compare skill performance in untrained lay persons randomised to receive either compression-only telephone CPR (Compression-only tel., n=29) or standard telephone CPR instructions (Standard tel., n=30). Performance was evaluated during standardised 10 min cardiac arrest simulations using a video recording and data from a laptop computer connected to the training manikin. A number of subjects in both groups did not open the airway. ⋯ Further research is necessary to establish if modifications to scripted telephone instructions can remedy the identified performance deficiencies. Eliminating instructions for rescue breaths from scripted telephone directions will have little impact on the ventilation of most patients. Research is required to determine if the consequent reduction in the delay to starting chest compressions and the significant increase in the number of compressions delivered can increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.