Resuscitation
-
To investigate the factors which influence decision making by experienced emergency physicians when they decide whether to (a) pronounce 'life extinct' in adult patients with non traumatic cardiac arrest while in the ambulance, or (b) bring them into the resuscitation room in the Emergency Department for further assessment/management. ⋯ The reasoning behind decisions made when a patient arrives at the Emergency Department in cardiac arrest is multifactorial. Strict guidelines would be difficult to construct since individuals vary in the importance they attach to different factors.
-
Comparative Study
Plasma epinephrine levels after epinephrine administration using different tracheal administration techniques in an adult CPR porcine model.
The aim of the study was to compare arterial plasma epinephrine levels after tracheal epinephrine application using three different tracheal instillation techniques at different tracheal levels in a porcine adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation model. In the prospective, randomized study, electrically-induced cardiopulmonary arrest was applied to 32 anaesthetized and paralyzed domestic pigs. After 3 min of cardiopulmonary arrest and 2 min of external chest compressions using a pneumatic compression device and mechanical ventilation, epinephrine was administered intravenously (20 microg/kg) or tracheally (50 microg/kg): using either direct injection into the upper end of the tracheal tube, via a catheter placed into the bronchial system and using a special tracheal application tube. ⋯ Total plasma epinephrine concentrations showed a significant increase in all groups, but with no difference between the tracheal groups. However, peak epinephrine levels in the intravenous group were significantly higher than in tracheal groups. We conclude that administration using three different tracheal instillation levels result in similar onset and peak plasma epinephrine levels in this setting and therefore the preferred method of tracheal epinephrine application for cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be selected by other criteria.
-
Comparative Study
Sodium pyruvate is better than sodium chloride as a resuscitation solution in a rodent model of profound hemorrhagic shock.
Pyruvate is an energy substrate that has both inotropic and antioxidant properties. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that survivorship would be better after resuscitation with 1.7% sodium pyruvate than 0.9% sodium chloride in a profound hemorrhagic shock model. The study was performed in a blinded manner. ⋯ We performed a comparison of survivorship at 50 min post resuscitation using a Z-test of proportions. Nine (90%) of the animals that received sodium pyruvate were living 50 min after resuscitation, whereas only three (30%) of the animals that received sodium chloride survived to the same time point. We conclude that sodium pyruvate is better than sodium chloride as a resuscitation solution in a model of profound hemorrhagic shock.
-
Comparative Study
Thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
To investigate the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic treatment for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) immediately after resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting. ⋯ Thrombolytic treatment is a safe and effective treatment in AMI even after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Magnesium sulfate in the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation in the prehospital setting.
To determine if magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) improves outcome in cardiac arrest patients initially in ventricular fibrillation (VF). ⋯ We failed to demonstrate that the administration of 2 g of MgSO(4) to prehospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF improves short or long term survival.