Journal of health economics
-
The hypothesis that dentists do not induce demand for their services is tested using reduced form estimates of the price elasticity of demand. If demand is autonomous, shifts in supply for whatever reason should generate equivalent estimates provided access costs change proportionately with shifts in supply. If demand inducement is present demand can appear to be very elastic, or very inelastic, depending on what is causing the shift in supply. Each of three applications of this test, conducted in the context of jointly estimated fee and quantity equations using annual Canadian data for 1956-1989, rejects the no inducement hypothesis.
-
We present a formal model of the relationship between a health care purchaser and a provider drawing on the recent experience of explicit contracting in the UK health sector. Specifically we model the contractual relationships emerging between District Health Authorities, who are presently the dominant health care purchasers, and the providers of hospital care. The comparative static analysis implies that the transaction cost of using non-local hospitals, the expected patient demand, the extent of excess capacity in local hospitals, and the proportion of that excess capacity expected to be lost to competitive purchasers, are all important determinants of the choice of contract.
-
This paper investigates the private/public mix in acute health care provision in the UK. It uses an interrelated shares model derived from a translog function combined with dynamic adjustment. Using prices for public care constructed from NHS waiting lists, the insurance cost of private care and the retain price index, impact, intermediate and long run elasticities of demand for private and public care are obtained. The role of hospital consultants and of an aging population are also considered.
-
Comparative Study
Equity in the finance of health care: some international comparisons.
This paper presents the results of a ten-country comparative study of health care financing systems and their progressivity characteristics. It distinguishes between the tax-financed systems of Denmark, Portugal and the U. ⋯ It concludes that tax-financed systems tend to be proportional or mildly progressive, that social insurance systems are regressive and that private systems are even more regressive. Out-of-pocket payments are in most countries an especially regressive means of raising health care revenues.
-
Comparative Study
Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons.
This paper presents the results of an eight-country comparative study of equity in the delivery of health care. Equity is taken to mean that persons in equal need of health care should be treated the same, irrespective of their income. Two methods are used to investigate inequity: an index of inequity based on standardized expenditure shares, and a regression-based test. The results suggest that inequity exists in most of the eight countries, but there is no simple one-to-one correspondence between a country's delivery system and the degree to which persons in equal need are treated the same.