European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Speed of onset of analgesic effect of intravenous ketorolac compared to morphine and placebo.
The speed of onset of analgesia following intravenous ketorolac, morphine and placebo was investigated in a single-dose, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of 105 patients. The onset of analgesia was defined as the time at which the pain intensity score reached 50% of the baseline score in 25% of patients. ⋯ Pain reduction by at least 50% occurred in 25% of patients within 40 min (placebo), 15 min (morphine 5 mg), 6 min (morphine 10 mg) and 20 min (ketorolac 10 mg). The pain reduction time for morphine (10 mg) was significantly shorter than that for ketorolac (P = 0.01) or placebo (P < 0.01).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia: the need for ephedrine and glycopyrrolate.
Sixty patients, ASA I-III, presenting for elective colonic surgery were studied to assess the stability of blood pressure and heart rate during anaesthesia with three equally potent anaesthetic techniques. Patients in group I (n = 20) received thiopentone induction, isoflurane and nitrous oxide; patients in group II (n = 20) received total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol; and patients in group III (n = 20) received intravenous propofol supplemented with nitrous oxide. Fentanyl and vecuronium were used in all three groups. ⋯ The drug was administered after intubation but before skin incision in the majority of cases (9/11). Glycopyrrolate was given to significantly more patients in group III (P < 0.025) to treat bradycardia, and in 21 of a total of 34 patients given glycopyrrolate it was administered before surgery. With the use of these additional drugs, there were no differences in the number of patients with 5 min episodes of hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia or bradycardia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus single dosing. A comparative study.
Continuous and single dose spinal anaesthesia were compared in a prospective randomized fashion in 108 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was via a 20 gauge polyamide multiperforated catheter introduced through an 18 gauge Tuohy needle. Single-dose spinal anaesthesia was performed with a 24 guage x 103 mm Sprotte spinal needle. ⋯ Hypotension was more frequent in those receiving single doses (P < 0.05). Caudal rotation of the outlet needle orifice to advance the catheter correlated with inadequate analgesia (P < 0.01, r = 0.38). There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesia for outpatient surgery: placebo versus naproxen sodium (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) given before or after surgery.
One hundred and eighty patients scheduled for day-care surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive naproxen sodium 1100 mg 1 h prior to surgery, naproxen sodium 1100 mg immediately after surgery, or placebo. The pre-surgery naproxen sodium group had significantly lower pain scores 1 h post-operatively and at discharge than the placebo group. At discharge both treatment groups were better than placebo. ⋯ A questionnaire concerning general acceptability of anaesthesia/analgesia showed similar results. Our conclusion is that naproxen is better than placebo for treatment of post-operative pain. The time of administration pre- or post-operatively is important for the immediate post-operative pain, but we found no support for the existence of 'pre-emptive analgesia'.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Technical problems and side effects associated with continuous intrathecal or epidural post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
Fifty-five patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia (4 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine) were randomized to receive post-operative analgesia either using an intrathecal or an epidural catheter. Associated technical problems and side effects were studied. In both groups per-operative analgesia was achieved with intrathecal 0.5% plain bupivacaine, 4 ml. ⋯ The number of side effects was 21 in the remaining spinal group (n = 20) and 18 in the 20 epidural group patients with successful infusions. One patient in the spinal catheter group developed postdural puncture headache. For post-operative pain relief the patients in the epidural group needed less supplementary intramuscular oxycodone (five doses/four patients) than the spinal group (17 doses/nine patients) (P < 0.05).